Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ditto
Second, it would dilute the influence of the wealthy by allowing many more citizens, millions I would bet, to contribute to their favored candidates up say $500 dollars at no incremental costs to them. There is no law ever going to be written that will take money out of politics.

Why not just write a law that limits all contribution to federal candidates be limited to $500 from citizen constituents? Wouldn't that also serve the same purpose?

96 posted on 09/16/2002 5:34:33 PM PDT by Looking for Diogenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: Looking for Diogenes
Why not just write a law that limits all contribution to federal candidates be limited to $500 from citizen constituents? Wouldn't that also serve the same purpose?

Perhaps, but I could make a very strong argument that such a law would be a violation of the first amendment. And what of the "idle billionaire" like the Rat from Jersey who is perfectly willing to spend $80 million of his own money to buy a Senate seat? With a $500 individual limit, very few could compete with him.

100 posted on 09/17/2002 8:29:27 AM PDT by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson