Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Looking for Diogenes
Yes, the Supreme Court has decided that money equals speech. An amendment could override that decision. A strict limit on money raised, combined with free TV advertising, would take most of the money out of politics.

I don't see money in politics as being as dangerous as limiting free speech or compelling private citizens to freely give their product away to politicians.

Like I said earlier, money is the force in politics. You can't deny it and if freely given with no strings attached, money is not a problem. In fact, it is a positive --- i.e. people getting involved by putting their money where their mouth is. I would like to see the system changed to encourage millions of smaller contributions to off-set the power that a handful of wealthy donors now have, all with strings attached. That is why I propose a straight tax credit for small contributions.

102 posted on 09/17/2002 11:50:36 AM PDT by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: Ditto
We may quibble about the details, but I certainly agree with you on the general course.
110 posted on 09/17/2002 6:26:22 PM PDT by Looking for Diogenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson