Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: johniegrad
Seeing as to how Israel has real dogs in that fight, and also a goodly supply of WMDs herself, a pre-emptive strike on Israel's part makes a lot more sense than one on ours.
4 posted on 09/12/2002 4:48:41 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: gcruse
Seeing as to how Israel has real dogs in that fight, and also a goodly supply of WMDs herself, a pre-emptive strike on Israel's part makes a lot more sense than one on ours.

It would if it weren't for the fact that the whole of the Islamic world would be in such an uproar over such an action [by the Israelis], that not only could it destroy any chances we had at securing bases and other strategic advantages, but it would very well initiate gov't coups by radical groups all over the region. Best that we take care of the Iraqi problem ourselves, and Israel can then respond if (or most likely when) they're attacked......but not before.

7 posted on 09/12/2002 5:00:10 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: gcruse
Seeing as to how Israel has real dogs in that fight, and also a goodly supply of WMDs herself, a pre-emptive strike on Israel's part makes a lot more sense than one on ours.

I would say our ally Israel is displaying much more trust in the US than many of our other so-called allies---I'm sure they feel a most urgent feeling to strike in such a manner to defend themselves; yet they are trying to work with the United States. It says quite a bit.

25 posted on 09/12/2002 7:57:23 PM PDT by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson