Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Special Ops boarding ship to search for Nuclear Material off the NJ shore
Fox News Alert | 9/12/02 | Brytani

Posted on 09/12/2002 10:15:38 AM PDT by Brytani

Fox News just broke in with an alert. Special Op's are now searching a Liberian flagged ship 8 miles off the coast of NJ looking for nuclear material. More information to follow.


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: nuclearweapons; ship; specialops; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 561-562 next last
To: Travis McGee
If that's the case then we have to check the whole waterway- if that ship followed the coast as the line's route seems to indicate, and there really was a device on board or material for same, there are a lot of targets along the way. It's a possibility a device could have been dropped in an important location overseas too, a place where our fleet may call or an important narrow straight.

Wasn't the alert supposed to be related to a person we captured from the far east?

And did you hear about Japan raising that North Korea ship? The thing had a three-engine small boat in it to get in closer to shore or ships. The thing was armed pretty good too.

281 posted on 09/12/2002 11:42:33 AM PDT by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: harpseal
I don't know-but I think NEST scrambles are relatively rare, are they not?
282 posted on 09/12/2002 11:43:20 AM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
When the ship arrives? At that point, wouldn't it be to late?

It may take time and many incremental shipments for terrorists to assemble a viable device.

283 posted on 09/12/2002 11:43:52 AM PDT by crypt2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
"I have signed legislation outlawing the rest of the world, the bombing begins in 5 minutes." President Lazamataz, just before his weekly radio address. "Whatsamatta, can't you people take a f***ing joke?" President Lazamataz, just after the press hyperventilates over the above remark.

"You know, I felt sorry about 9/11 until I realized the New York Times operates out of Manhattan. And you a**holes can PRINT THAT!!"

284 posted on 09/12/2002 11:43:53 AM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: DETAILER
"...they also need to check every single place in the US that ship has been for about the last year or so and search them."

Not necessary...it is probably a "container" that is hot, not the ship. That container could have been carried on any other ship prior to this trip. What you want to do is identify the container then track it (good luck).

285 posted on 09/12/2002 11:44:22 AM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Pakistan's nukes are the greatest threat because its army and security/intelligence service (ISI) guarding them are infested with Islamic fanatics who for years had an overt alliance with Al Qaeda to gain control of the Pakistani government, plus further Pakistani interests in Afghanistan and Kashmir. This alliance still exists concerning Kashmir, and that's not all.

The ISI's then chief, General Mahmud Ahmad, was in Washington on 9/11. That might have been coincidental, Al Qaeda's attempt to "dirty" the ISI, or evidence of misuse of diplomatic immunity to provide C3I for the 9/11 attacks. But the Times of India reported last October that General Ahmad had ordered payment of $100,000 to WTC attacker Mohammed Atta, and that he was fired as ISI chief when the US learned of this. ---

From Strategypage quoting Timesof India,but this is why i say Pakistan' true role in 9/11 has not seen the light of day.
286 posted on 09/12/2002 11:44:44 AM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]

To: DETAILER
ONe report said it hadn't been to the US in years and was way overdue for a safety inspection.
287 posted on 09/12/2002 11:45:15 AM PDT by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: Space Wrangler
The laws of search and seizure are quite diffrent on the sea. The Coast Guard, or any other LEA can board and inspect without the cause for a warrant.

Kewl.

288 posted on 09/12/2002 11:45:41 AM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: crypt2k
I suspect that any radioactive contraband was tossed over the side on entering the bay.

That wouldn't make sense. They'd know they had to be inspected, and would have been hoping to slip through. To just toss it overboard would have ruined the mission.

IMHO, any jettisoning would have been seen and noted.

289 posted on 09/12/2002 11:45:50 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Just so you realize what precisely the situation is. The CG when they decided to bring the vessel into port for a detailed inspection was most concerned about stowaways. It was while searching for stoways that the radiation alert was sounded. Now if there were stoways then and there are none now??? The possibility of an underwater hatch is not all that remote.

Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - yorktown

290 posted on 09/12/2002 11:46:57 AM PDT by harpseal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: crypt2k
The package hijacker Jarrah sent to his girlfriend in Turkey right before 9/11 contained documentation of his flying and diving lessons.
291 posted on 09/12/2002 11:47:00 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
NEW YORK (Reuters) - U.S. authorities are still investigating a freighter on which low traces of radiation were detected, a Coast Guard spokesman said Thursday.

The freighter, which is under Liberian flag, but owned by a German company, remained 6 miles off the coast of New Jersey, where agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the U.S. Customs Service, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and the U.S. Department of Energy were investigating.

"It is probably going to take some time as it is a fairly large ship," an FBI spokesman said.

While checking for stowaways on the "Palermo Senator" on Wednesday at Port Newark, New Jersey, Coast Guard agents detected low levels of radiation and ordered the ship out to sea.

Ole Sweedlund, deputy managing director of the North American arm of shipping giant Hanjin, which chartered the vessel before subletting it to German company DSR/Senator Lines, said there were no radioactive materials listed on the ship's manifest.

"We are working with government authorities to solve the situation and hopefully we will have a resolution within a day or so," Sweedlund told Reuters.

The ship's last port of call was Valencia, Spain. Before that, it stopped at various ports in Southeast Asia and the Middle East. It was scheduled to offload 655 containers in Port Elizabeth, New Jersey.

Officials declined to provide additional details on the cargo and Sweedlund said the containers could contain any type of cargo originated in the Mediterranean, although he could not say for sure that some of it was not loaded elsewhere.

The managing owner of the ship, Reederei F. Laeisz of Reederei F. Laeisz in Rostock, Germany, said in a statement the investigation "is under way and will be completed by Sept. 13, 2002. The charterers of the vessel confirm that no illegal cargo has been loaded."

The Coast Guard raised its safety and security procedures as the United States went on high state of alert for the one- year commemoration of the attacks last year on Washington and New York.

The United States has for months spearheaded a campaign to tighten up security at international ports, as it is worried that one day it could receive a "dirty bomb" -- a crude nuclear device -- concealed in a shipping container and loaded overseas in a port with lax security.
292 posted on 09/12/2002 11:47:06 AM PDT by seeker41
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
>>One method would be to drop a nuke in a welded watertight capsule from the bottom of a ship when it was in a US port with a timer or other detonation device. Such a nuke could already have been dropped while the ship was in harbor<<

Remember the flak a few months ago about Islamakazis buying or renting nonrebreathers for deep diving?

I wonder why they wanted that stuff?

293 posted on 09/12/2002 11:47:18 AM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: Dog
on MSNBC just said there are 650+ containers on the ship and it will take time searching them....so it sounds like they are going to go thru each one of them.

Remember late last year they discovered someone from the middle east traveling in a container in an Italian port - I'll try to find the reference.

294 posted on 09/12/2002 11:47:30 AM PDT by crypt2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
An underwater drop would be simple to do.

Heck, a few years ago we found a damn 100+' SUBMARINE being built high up in Colombia for shipping cocaine to the USA! It was built in segments for road transport and assembly at the coast and was almost ready. A SUBMARINE.

Getting WMD into the USA is a joke. One 40 foot shipping container could be the equivalent of 20 OKC bombs, and set with a GPS trigger to detonate when crossing a certain bridge, or when being trucked across a city. (98% of containers are offloaded by automated cranes and never looked at inside until they reach Walmart etc.)

295 posted on 09/12/2002 11:48:25 AM PDT by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: harpseal
The possibility of an underwater hatch is not all that remote.

And it might jibe with those warnings issued several months back about scuba shops and kayaks.

296 posted on 09/12/2002 11:49:03 AM PDT by TrappedInLiberalHell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: Thud
Gen. Musharraf addressed the UN today. A nuclear event in NYC today could take him out, along with lots of other world leaders.
297 posted on 09/12/2002 11:49:41 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]

To: harpseal
It was while searching for stoways that the radiation alert was sounded.

Short of there being a standard search for radioactive stowaways, this doesn't explain how/why they happened to detect the radioactivity in the first place.

I'm ignorant here: does customs usually search for radioactivity?

298 posted on 09/12/2002 11:49:56 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: one_particular_harbour
Oooh, that hurt. "Concocted" right down the road in New Bern, Pepsi has always been my first choice. With Coca-Cola, I can feel it eating away the enamel on my teeth as I drink it. But, I do keep a bottle of Coca-Cola in my garage for when I need to clean my truck's battery terminals... ;-)
299 posted on 09/12/2002 11:49:59 AM PDT by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: crypt2k
I don't know why they'd toss anything over the side. Customs and other harbor folks always board the boats, so what would make them toss it. They just didn't hide it well enough, or the stuff they were carrying was dropped off in Egypt for ME engagement. It's probably dirty bomb stuff.
300 posted on 09/12/2002 11:50:21 AM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 561-562 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson