Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ArneFufkin
Been doing the surfing channel thingy and seems SOME of the reporters who gave W a B+ on his speech at the UN are doing a 180 degree turn. They insist that the evidence is not there, and that the whole UN does not support action against SadDANM! Media WHORES are still saying the majority of RATS, even some pubbies and the public are not in line to support W entirely into a FULL BLOWN WAR. CLYMERS! I guess you can't take the LIBERALISM out of them, NOPE! NOPE INDEED, they're back to their SHAMELESS ANTI-AMERICAN SELFISH WAYS! It was good while it lasted though!
1,604 posted on 09/12/2002 3:00:20 PM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1601 | View Replies ]


To: RoseofTexas
Rose, I'm just praying Maureen Dowd is supportive. She's a Pulitzer Prize winner you know. She's acerbic, colloquial and chock full of clever pop-culture references. She'd write just like Mark Steyn, Dennis Miller or P.J. O'Rourke if those writers were a bit unfunnier, less smart and not so talented.

But, no military campaign is mired in a "hopeless quagmire" until Maureen says so. She used the term F-15 "Strike Eagle" once, and she likes the way Tom Cruise wears flight suit.

She's much prettier than Catherine Zeta-Jones too. Michael Douglas was obviously threatened by a smart, independent woman.

1,610 posted on 09/12/2002 3:35:08 PM PDT by ArneFufkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1604 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson