Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Live Thread: Bush Speech to U.N.
www.freerepublic.com | September 12, 2002

Posted on 09/12/2002 7:02:45 AM PDT by Howlin

Live discussion and comments about Bush's speech to the U.N. today, and the reaction to it.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: iraq; jebbushsucks; sanctions; un; votemcbride
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,681-1,7001,701-1,7201,721-1,740 ... 1,761-1,767 next last
To: ChadGore
The big difference between Clinton and Bush is that Clinton was a win or lose player. If he couldn't force a win, he'd blow up the game. Clinton never won a thing. He was a spectacular failure in every respect except that phony dotcom Nasdaq market. Bush is a win-win guy. He doesn't need to be the cock of the walk, he just wants to move toward his goals.

We have a lot of Lose-lose characters around here.

1,701 posted on 09/13/2002 6:11:51 AM PDT by ArneFufkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1700 | View Replies]

To: ArneFufkin
The Saudis CANNOT openly support us. But, they have always been masters of intrigue and survival. They have their hooks everywhere in that region. We need that.

I saw Bush's countenance when he stated that the "Saudis are close allies". He doesn't say that about the French or Germans or Egyptians or Japanese. He meant it. They are. Appearances are deceiving especially with that despotic crew.

Agreed. There is so much more going on than we can grasp, but it's clear that the Saudis cannot openly support us, and that they can do more to help us in the region than any other country.

Your observation on Bush's 'countenance' is most interesting, and something I had not thought about. I have wondered why he said that they are our allies, when they do not seem to be our allies, but your point that he really does mean it because it is true because of what is going on behind the scenes, makes sense.

btw, the only point you've made on this thread with which I disagree is that Hannity listens. He's much too busy pontificating to pay attention to his 'guests' IMO. But I sure agree with you on Brit. He's a journalist, a professional, and one of a kind. I just hope some younger journalists are paying attention and learning from him, so that he's not the last true journalist.

1,702 posted on 09/13/2002 6:15:37 AM PDT by ohioWfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1699 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
I've listened to Hannity working his radio show, and that's a different environment. He's a superpro.

His work on the TV show is superb. He has to package a commentary masquerading as an interview because that's how bang-bang, 20 seconds till commercial TV works. Compare his mastery of the situation to the token GOP voice on CNN Bob Novak ... Bob's a day late and a dollar short these days. He's making his point, and we're watching a Bowflex commercial

1,703 posted on 09/13/2002 6:21:42 AM PDT by ArneFufkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1702 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
Bill Sammon is the unsung superstar of TV punditry. He's a real, day job reporter too.
1,704 posted on 09/13/2002 6:23:27 AM PDT by ArneFufkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1702 | View Replies]

To: ArneFufkin
He has to package a commentary masquerading as an interview because that's how bang-bang, 20 seconds till commercial TV works.

That may well be, but sometimes the masquerade is a bit too obvious. I haven't heard his radio show, and have only heard him on radio as a sub for Rush. I've seen the same brash ideologue on occasion there, and even though I agree with most of his views, it's an irritant. He's not offensive to me all (or even most) of the time, but it's often enough to keep me from being a regular viewer of his show.

Agree with you about Sammon.

1,705 posted on 09/13/2002 6:40:01 AM PDT by ohioWfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1704 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
By the way, I want to ally myself with your remarks regarding Bush and his team.

I could always tell when W wasn't behind a policy or program. See: Campaign Finance Reform. He couldn't be bothered, and I agree with him. He was setting up his domestic security agency, he was dealing with anthrax ... and he figured that since he raised over $150 million in hard money from over 40,000 individual GOP donors, a ban on soft money would not be a strategic defeat for his party.

He wasn't thrilled about the Farm Bill either. That was a calculated move to give tribute to the right of Senators to be soulless, shameless pigs. (Pigs got some big cash, too bad the pigs, not Harkin, are fated for that short walk and long ride to the truck of eternity. I also have a problem with slaughtering pigs, that's for another day. They're smarter and more aware than the average Golden Retriever) Bush wrote it off, there was no passion or joy, that was ugly bidness.

But, the Education Bill ... he was stoked. His outreach to Hispanics and his assurances to Muslim and Arab Americans ... that is a soul deep goal. His acknowledgement of the Kennedy's was sincere and a tribute to occupying their weird, weird place in our history and culture. He's not an operator like Clinton and Gingrich.

So, when he furrows that brow and focuses those eyes and says ... "Regime change is this nation's policy" or when asked what the goal of his War and Terror was ... he said "Victory." Yeah, that's having the mental toughness of Tiger Woods, AND the game of Tiger Woods. That's the mojo I saw when he talked about the Saudis, it was like "Back off, stop the smear campaign". Because, there was a concerted anti-Saudi thing going on. Bush sent a signal loud and clear. He's in a surly mood right now.

Hey Freepers, heu Daschele, hey world, hey Saddam: Don't go out of your way to tease a bear! ;^)

1,706 posted on 09/13/2002 7:03:01 AM PDT by ArneFufkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1705 | View Replies]

To: ArneFufkin
You don't want to win. You don't know how to win.

The way to win is to kill those who've killed you and make sure they don't do it again. Our war is with Islamic Fundamentalists. Iraq is not such a country.

Before some fool tells me that what I wrote is somehow support for Saddam, get a grip.

The problem in the Mid East is due to the fact of corrupt dictators running the show in every single country there. This in turn causes all of the people there to hate. The fact that their hate is directed at us and Israel is testament to just how stupid these people really are.

1,707 posted on 09/13/2002 8:29:27 AM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1694 | View Replies]

To: ArneFufkin
The agenda is manyfold. It includes:
1,708 posted on 09/13/2002 8:31:13 AM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1695 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
The Saudi situation is entirely different, and though their record on terrorism is not good, the threat they pose as a nation to us, or to the world is not remotely as grave as that of Iraq.

I guess you didn't hear about the WTC and Pentagon attacks. You can argue that Iraq presents more of a problem to us in the future even though I disagree but you can't argue who has killed thousands of Americans so far.

1,709 posted on 09/13/2002 8:33:51 AM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1698 | View Replies]

To: ArneFufkin
Go on living in your Pollyana dream world. Fortunately, George Bush isn't. He understands exactly what "WE HAVE THIS ANTHRAX YOU CAN NOT STOP US" means (it means -- kill Saddam, and kiss New York and DC goodbye). Which is why he's continuing to stall by punting this thing to the UN for more time-killing games with weapons inspections, and why we won't be taking out Saddam Hussein any time soon, except in your fantasies.
1,710 posted on 09/13/2002 8:39:18 AM PDT by The Great Satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1688 | View Replies]

To: sakic
The guys who killed us killed themselves in the process.

Unfortunately, they weren't in the employ of any particular nation state.

Iraq is a menace. They are working on bad medicine. That ugliness will find its way here if we don't snuff it out. It's mass murder fodder, available to any bidders.

Snuff time.

It's that simple. Iraq is an icon, they've spit in the face of the U.N. and the U.S. for the last 6 years.

See, this is about a militant Islamism winning streak that should have been bitch slapped at the start. Al Qaida and other extremist thugs blew up TWO of our fricking embassies without retribution. They killed our boys in the Khobar Towers and on the U.S.S. Cole without retribution. They set off a truck bomb in the basement of the WTC without retribution. They killed a lot of our countrymates a year ago.

Bill Clinton is a traitor. He can never bullshit his way out of his profound dereliction of duty and cowardice. But, he's history, and he'll be dealt with.

Cue long overdue retribution. The dismantling of Iraq is morally justified. We had young soldiers who died in 1991 to stop the evil schemes of Saddam Hussein. We spared his life, his society, his people to honor our word. He's pissed on all of our soldier's graves for seven years now. Now he dies.

Iraq needed to fall. That will send a message that Bill Clinton would have sent had he harbored a scintilla of honor, integrity and character. It sends a message to the Arab and Muslim world ... we're not f***ing around this time.

Iran will fall from its own fissure. Shit canning Hussein, establishing a new democratic Iraq, can do nothing but put the last straw on some Mullah's favorite camel. Iran is ready to burn.

The fact is, sakic, you don't know WHO killed the 3000 victims. That world is nebulous. Bin Laden was booted from Saudi Arabia, as were many of his followers. You think he lived in Afghanistan because of the amenities? These are individuals without borders, they have no start or finish, but ... they do require money and protection and papers. Iraq gone. Iran gone. Oooh, those papers are now a bitch. That money is drying up too. The Hezbollah martyrs are giving plasma.

Your problem is that you won't support anything that permits our country and this president to win.

If Bush was planning to attack Jedda, you'd say ... what about Islamabad? Lose lose lose.

1,711 posted on 09/13/2002 8:55:16 AM PDT by ArneFufkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1707 | View Replies]

To: The Great Satan
Yep. Dolt.
1,712 posted on 09/13/2002 8:57:49 AM PDT by ArneFufkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1710 | View Replies]

To: sakic
Have a glass of bile. You are either stupid, or just a cynical jerk.

Yeah, this is about oil and daddy.

Isn't it sometime in September when you shed your skin?

1,713 posted on 09/13/2002 9:00:33 AM PDT by ArneFufkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1708 | View Replies]

To: ArneFufkin
Care to give me a date for when Saddam will be gone? Perhaps we could have a little bet on it.
1,714 posted on 09/13/2002 9:01:33 AM PDT by The Great Satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1712 | View Replies]

To: The Great Satan
Can I collect the winnings from your day nurse?
1,715 posted on 09/13/2002 9:03:58 AM PDT by ArneFufkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1714 | View Replies]

To: ArneFufkin
Give me a date when you think Saddam will be gone.
1,716 posted on 09/13/2002 9:07:35 AM PDT by The Great Satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1715 | View Replies]

To: The Great Satan
December 1. Stated before. To you.
1,717 posted on 09/13/2002 9:11:18 AM PDT by ArneFufkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1716 | View Replies]

To: ArneFufkin
Okay, let's bookmark this thread and we can revisit on December 1, because my bet is he will still be here.
1,718 posted on 09/13/2002 9:28:17 AM PDT by The Great Satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1717 | View Replies]

To: ArneFufkin
I would be delighted to be proved wrong, incidentally. Unfortunately, life is not a fairy tale, and I don't think it's going to happen.
1,719 posted on 09/13/2002 9:30:57 AM PDT by The Great Satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1717 | View Replies]

To: The Great Satan
Wow, you must type with your nose while sporting that straighjacket, huh?

No bet. I want December 1 to be a good day. That means no you.

1,720 posted on 09/13/2002 9:32:26 AM PDT by ArneFufkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1718 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,681-1,7001,701-1,7201,721-1,740 ... 1,761-1,767 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson