Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Monty22
Don't be too gleeful about this. Even if no sane person would blame Bush, this is going to have a serious downside for him come the election. It's going to increase the "we wuz robbed" turnout come November. Prediction: whoever wins the democratic primary will get massive support from the loser's voters, because the dems will want to "take back" the election process.

Do not expect a similarly high turn out for Bush. Anger motivates. Complacency dampens turnout.

I'm not arguing the merits of the case here. Just saying that if you look at it from a RAT voter's point of view, you see that it revives and validates all their anger over 2000, which had sort of quieted down before this. So this is not a good thing for Bush. It really could cost him the electin
5 posted on 09/12/2002 3:47:51 AM PDT by leftiesareloonie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: leftiesareloonie
That's assuming this crowd has a memory longer than a few weeks, I doubt it.

I see your point though.. This proves that election fraud will happen again in democrat regions as well.
6 posted on 09/12/2002 3:49:23 AM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: leftiesareloonie
What it does show is the extremely high value of a black third party candidate. Al Sharpton would without a doubt be the GOP's biggest asset.
14 posted on 09/12/2002 4:08:39 AM PDT by Charlotte Corday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson