Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: traditionalist
Tell me, how exactly is toppling Saddam going to help us get Al Qaeda if they are in a part of the country not controlled by Saddam?

This PROVES beyond a reasonable doubt that you are not paying attention AND forcing evidence that is before you through an ideological filter.

What did the President say about nations who harbor terrorists? Al Qaeda is responsible for the deaths of 3,000+ of our citizens on our own soil, yet you want to pick a nit over where in Iraq these terrorists are?

I don't think so.

Iraq is harboring these terrorists, and working in a direct violation of the resolutions that Hussein himself signed after the Gulf War. So toppling Saddam is a twofer.

But in the end, your objections don't, and won't, matter.

The President said, "Let's roll." And we're going to roll. Like it or not. He laid out the evidence against Saddam Hussein before the entire world.

None are so blind as those who refuse to see.

Get ready.

155 posted on 09/12/2002 9:59:03 AM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]


To: rdb3
Al Qaeda is responsible for the deaths of 3,000+ of our citizens on our own soil, yet you want to pick a nit over where in Iraq these terrorists are?

NORTHEN IRAQ IS NOT UNDER SADDAM'S CONTROL. Hence you don't need to depose Saddam to get at the Al Qeada elements there. Is that so difficult to understand?

172 posted on 09/12/2002 11:42:44 AM PDT by traditionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson