Skip to comments.
City May Outlaw Sniper Gun Sales
Los Angeles Daily News
| 09-11-2002
Posted on 09/11/2002 6:48:26 AM PDT by boris
Los Angeles City Councilman Mark Ridley-Thomas on Tuesday introduced a motion to ban the sale of .50-caliber sniper rifles in Los Angeles.
The proposal, which will be considered by the council next week, has the support of six other council members.
-Article Ends-
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: banglist; guncontrol
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-229 next last
To: nravoter
Forgive my ignorance, but what does the BMG stand for...I have looked in several magazines and other sources but cannot come up with the answer. Doesn't mean I don't want one though.
21
posted on
09/11/2002 7:23:44 AM PDT
by
IYAS9YAS
To: IYAS9YAS
BMG = Browning Machine Gun
22
posted on
09/11/2002 7:25:23 AM PDT
by
umgud
To: IYAS9YAS; umgud
BMG = "
Big
Mother-loving
Gun"!
No, just joking, umgud called it correctly.
:-)
To: umgud
My, how my ingorance ran deep on that one, thanks for the answer. I was just going to put my own definition on it if I couldn't find out...Brutishly Mean Gun.
24
posted on
09/11/2002 7:29:46 AM PDT
by
IYAS9YAS
To: Bringbackthedraft
This is an over kill weapon for the neighborhood. One accidental round going off can go through several homes. There is no need to have this kind of a large caliber HP weapon in a large city.I hope you forgot the sarcasm tag
To: Bringbackthedraft
So if you're a city-dweller you can't compete in shooting matches? Because that's the number one use of these items, competition shooting. "Sniper rifle" is an emotionally-colored term that is used by the ignorant - have you ever heard of a single "sniper" killing in this country from these guns? A single crime, even?
Beware of deciding that you're the arbiter of what other people "need" - that's an attitude used by authoritarians to run other people's lives. There are a number of people who have decided that you don't "need" certain types of vehicles, or certain types of food, and definitely certain types of recreation. The question is, how do you feel about their ability to force you to obey them?
To: Bringbackthedraft
This is an over kill weapon for the neighborhood. One accidental round going off can go through several homes. Nah, the .50 BMG is a sissy round. This is the real deal:
To: Bringbackthedraft
"This is an over kill weapon for the neighborhood. One accidental round going off can go through several homes. There is no need to have this kind of a large caliber HP weapon in a large city." Sigh. The Second Amendment says nothing about "need". It says, "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." This is clear language and its meaning cannot be mistaken unless wilfully.
When the ".50 caliber sniper rifle" flap went off, the papers were in an uproar over the 'fact' that "one shot can down a helicopter."
I wrote a letter to the paper (for some reason they declined to print it):
"Thank goodness someone is finally addressing the epidemic of helicopter shoot-downs. Why, just the other day, one crashed in my yard. Fellow who shot it only winged it, though, and I had to put it out of its misery. The haul-away costs are bankrupting me."
=================
I don't own a .50-caliber sniper rifle. I wish I did. Not because I need it...but because if these people don't want me to have it, that is sufficient justification to get one.
You may have forgotten--like most of the populace--that Americans have a strong streak of oneryness. Tell me I "can't" or "shouldn't" for "my own good" and I'll shove that .50-caliber barrel where the sun don't shine...and start angling for a larger caliber.
--Boris
28
posted on
09/11/2002 7:45:40 AM PDT
by
boris
To: boris
This is one more step along the road to incremental dismemberment of the Second Amendment by the same kind of liberal lunatics who support unilateral disarmament against terrorists, criminals and foreign foes.
I wonder if they will outlaw .58 caliber civil war guns?
These idiots probably do not even recognize the ramifications of their actions.
29
posted on
09/11/2002 7:49:52 AM PDT
by
ZULU
To: Bringbackthedraft
An automobile can passed 65 miles an hour, this is over kill for a typical neigborhood pehaps we should also do something about those horrible horrible cars that actually kill much more people per year that those nasty nasty 50 cal."SNIPER" GUNS. take a pill and lie down.
To: Bringbackthedraft
Go back and hide under your bed. We'll let you know when it's safe to come out again.
31
posted on
09/11/2002 7:54:05 AM PDT
by
PLMerite
To: Bringbackthedraft
One accidental round going off can go through several homes. I see you subscribe to the "gun safety" mantra B#llsh!T!
There is no need to have this kind of a large caliber HP weapon in a large city.
In actuality, these elitist politicians don't like them because they can be a threat to their bullet-proof limosines! Don't think for a moment this is a "gun safety" issue. It is about controlling the serfs!
32
posted on
09/11/2002 7:57:40 AM PDT
by
Gritty
To: Bringbackthedraft
Apparently you are confusing NEEDs with RIGHTS.
To: ZULU
These idiots probably do not even recognize the ramifications of their actionsYou bet they realize the ramifications of their actions. They are working toward a gun-controlers wet dream of the USA - where only the police and military are armed. Then there can be no effective resistance to their most extreme social engineering plans.
To: Bringbackthedraft
Any rifle will go through several houses, and they are almost all overkill for homedefense. The second amendment isn't just about homedefense.
35
posted on
09/11/2002 8:01:43 AM PDT
by
Dead Dog
To: boris
To: RogueIsland
37
posted on
09/11/2002 8:15:45 AM PDT
by
Jimbaugh
To: MD_Willington_1976
Nitro Express in considerably less energetic than .50 BMG
Nitro Express Bullet Weight; 900 grains
Muzzle Velocity; 1950 fps, Energy; 7591 ft/lbs
.50 BMG Bullet Weight; 750 grains
Muzzle Velocity; 2910 fps, Energy; 13048 ft/lbs
To: Bringbackthedraft
any fool that chambers a round in this rifle in a home or place of residence is a idiot.
39
posted on
09/11/2002 8:26:23 AM PDT
by
ezo4
To: Bringbackthedraft
The only time I remember anyone using a .50 cal in the LA area was during the Watts riots. Someone took a shot at a National Guard vehicle with a .22 and the NG gunner replied with a burst from his BMG. The NCO in charge chewed him out for being so quick on the trigger, reminding him that his rounds were probably still going through walls and buildings.
As usual though, the politicians are reacting to imaginary dangers, since .50 cal. rifles would have only very limited use in an urban area. As someone else pointed out though, the smaller .30 cal rifles, which would be much more useful, will be next on the 'banned' list.
40
posted on
09/11/2002 8:33:29 AM PDT
by
oldfart
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-229 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson