Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tuco-bad
And yet you support the decision to do NOTHING, which is what was done about Flight 77.

Read up on the kamikazes. Many pilots were approached, few accepted. The ones who didn't accept the mission were never criticized by the program's backers--because that decisionw was correctly viewed as a very personal one, with no predetermined "correct" answer. It required a lot of soul-searching on the part of the prospective kamikaze pilot.

Sounds inconsistant to me.

No, it's an understanding that you really can't morally order someone to do something like that.

You have a choice to either (a) do nothing and hope you can get armed aircraft up in time, or (b) go out and gain entrance to Valhalla on one's own hook through glorious self-sacrifice.

I'm not going to speak ill of the guy who doesn't go for Option B. It's an intensely personal decision. And I'm not going to speak ill of a guy who doesn't go for a PR-related action to LOOK like he's doing something.

35 posted on 09/10/2002 9:30:06 AM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Poohbah
And yet you support the decision to do NOTHING, which is what was done about Flight 77.

Read up on the kamikazes.

I never advocated that our F-16 pilots be kamikazes.

I said repeatly that they might have been able to distract the hijackers.

39 posted on 09/10/2002 10:33:05 AM PDT by Tuco-bad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson