Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
Thank you Clinton for leaving war planes stripped of weapons.

Let's be a tad more accurate: thank you Clinton for not noticing that the Cold War was over.

The reason why there weren't enough armed fighters on alert to cover the country is simple in concept, but difficult to understand in practice.

Maintaining armed aircraft on constant alert is hard on aircrews, hard on aircraft, and leads to the occasional weapons mishap--and is thus very expensive over the long haul. To avoid these problems, the Pentagon, way back in the mists of the Cold War, "de-alerted" interceptors unless Soviet bombers were moved from operating bases deep inside the USSR (from whence they could not attack America) to forward bases in Siberia.

This made sense back in the days when the US and the USSR were engaged in the Cold War. However, the Cold War ended in 1991, and the Russian bombers began to cheerfully rust away at their main bases deep inside the XUSSR. We proceeded to de-alert our birds, and with only one exception (during the Kosovo mess in 1999), both sides stayed at low alert levels.

Nobody ever called the practice into question, even after Operation Bojinka was exposed in 1995. That's where those with at least the good sense God gave a crabapple should have started asking, "Why are we doing things like this?"

10 posted on 09/09/2002 5:22:20 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Poohbah
It was quite a bad spot.

Atleast have fighters armed, for crying out loud! What really hurts is the fact that as a result those men were willing to RAM a hijacked plane.

Why must brave men be put in such situations?
22 posted on 09/09/2002 8:27:38 PM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson