Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Poohbah
Then, either (a) other people know enough to bring indictments (thus making McVeigh superfluous), or (b) McVeigh was the only guy who did know with any certainty, and your argument is baseless. You can't argue both sides of the case.

You're making an uncomplicated issue complicated. McVeigh had help to blow up OKC. The Clinton Administration knew that the Iraqis were in on it but kept quiet so they could blame groups that are considered to be on the right. When it became clear McVeigh was going to be the good soldier and not rat out his help, the Clinton Administration ran with the notion that the right was responsible for the terrorism. I have no idea what you even mean by your points a and b above. It looks to me that you're embarassed for taking the naive view that McVeigh was a lone madman the last few years and are speaking uncomprehendable gibberish to get out of it.

102 posted on 09/10/2002 6:55:46 AM PDT by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: #3Fan
Advantage #3Fan.......
104 posted on 09/10/2002 8:36:28 AM PDT by hove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson