Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Joe Brower
Twist it around all you like, but a pipe bomb is NOT a "weapon of mass destruction".

JB, I agree with you. My comment had nothing to do with the pipe bomb. It had to do with your commentary on the use of the term "WMD".

17 posted on 09/09/2002 11:02:25 AM PDT by Go Gordon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Go Gordon
When I was TAD with the Marines EOD twenty years ago (quite a fun bunch, I can assure you), WMDs were solely ABC. Even goodies like Daisy-cutters, large ANFO and similiar weapons did not qualify as WMDs. I figure EOD specialists ought to know. I still don't like the WMD label being applied to everything under the sun that goes bang. The term thusly loses it's definition.

As far as Americans waking up to the threat, well, I fully expect one of our larger cities to be a total wipe before that happens. And when (not if) it does, you'll see a lot of "woulda, shoulda, coulda" finger-pointing. And we'll still have the usual amicus hostis apologists running around mewling their usual tripe. Assuming they aren't part of the ash-heap, of course.


18 posted on 09/09/2002 11:13:15 AM PDT by Joe Brower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson