Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dog Gone
>I suspect those are aftershocks, which are pretty normal after a quake of this magnitude. Typically they diminish over time and in size.

How do we know that this was the top end of the quake?  I was once in the midst of an earthquake swarm not far from a volcanic mountain.  The geologists called and were very interested in what was going on.  I asked, "How do you know if this is a swarm building up to a big blow or quake or just a swarm cooling down from one already passed?"

They said.  "We don't know.  We can only tell by looking back after the biggest event."

If a swarm predates a big blow (like Mt. St. Helens did and like the various swarms around the world), then you can't tell if a swarm of varying sizes (say 3.7, 4.2, 3.6, 4.0, 3.9, 4.5, 4.6) or as in this instance 7.6, 4.9, 5.1, 5.0, 5.0, 5.0, 5.1 is getting bigger or getting smaller.  In other words, the 7.6 might not have been the top end.

Here is a book which indicates that accurate forecasts can be made in the scientific community.   Volcano Eruption Great Earthquakes Advance Warning Techniques Book


55 posted on 09/09/2002 8:59:40 PM PDT by 2sheep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: 2sheep
Earthquakes associated with magmatic movement underground are in a completely different class than earthquakes, for instance, on the San Andreas Fault.
57 posted on 09/09/2002 10:10:01 PM PDT by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson