Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Skwidd
But by doing this we will let Saddam and Ossama get strong and eventually they will attack us again. We can't take that risk!
74 posted on 09/08/2002 6:11:11 PM PDT by adam stevens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: adam stevens
But by doing this we will let Saddam and Ossama get strong and eventually they will attack us again. We can't take that risk!

Yes, but a good intelligence agency unhindered by the feel-good politics of the moment and proficient snipers on call can solve those problems before they get started. One bullet is a lot less expensive than a battlegroup deployment.

99 posted on 09/08/2002 7:39:49 PM PDT by Skwidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: adam stevens
At Dissent's first editorial board meeting after the attacks, the liveliest topic of conversation was reportedly Chomsky, whom Walzer appears to regard as an even greater menace to society than Osama himself.

Sounds reasonable to me. Since Osama assumed room temperature several months ago, Chomsky is indeed more dangerous - as is the rest of the anti-American left.

105 posted on 09/08/2002 10:14:17 PM PDT by TheMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson