The fact remains that if there was any known meeting between Atta and Saddam the administration would be screaming this in the face of any reporter or potential coalition member they could find. Do you actually think they wouldn't have mentioned the small detail of Atta meets Saddam to the delegation from congress the other day? If it was mentioned do you think there would be one single member leaving that meeting with even the slightest reservation in regard to invading Iraq?
Somebody somewhere is hoping we're stupid, "leaking" this propagandic horseflop is beyond insulting.
Atta met al Ani in Prague. Hussein trains hijackers at Salman Pak. Atta was a hijacker.
Don't bet the house that Atta didn't travel to Baghdad.
You assume too much. Perhaps "yes" on both of your questions, too dynamic to review with this kind of contention.