Skip to comments.
Exploring Iraq link to pre-Sept. 11 acts
The Indianapolis Star ^
| 9-7-02
| Editorial Board
Posted on 09/07/2002 4:46:24 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
Edited on 05/07/2004 6:26:33 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Our position is: Congress should hold hearings on evidence of previous Iraqi connections to terror.
Astatement by former CIA Director James Woolsey has given new credibility to suspicions of Iraqi involvement in the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing and the World Trade Center bombing of 1993 -- enough to merit congressional hearings.
(Excerpt) Read more at indystar.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Indiana; US: New York; US: Oklahoma
KEYWORDS: 911; cia; iraq; okcbombing; oklahomacity; timothymcveigh; woolsey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
To: okie01
I'm wondering that, too. The suspense is killing me. But, it's probably not doing Saddam's hypertension much good, either.
To: OKCSubmariner
Thanks for the ping and the post. Do I see a bit of a crack in the wall of concealment? Thanks for all you do. ^5
22
posted on
09/07/2002 10:06:20 AM PDT
by
amom
To: DB; Oldeconomybuyer
Don't kid yourselves too much about Arlen Specter.
Despite his image popularized by Oliver Stone in "JFK," and the "Scottish Law" comment, he is a very powerful member of the Senate. He could never have remained there all these years if that wasn't the case.
To: *OKCbombing; Alamo-Girl; Gary Aldrich; amom; archy; aristeides; AtticusX; backhoe; Betty Jo; ...
ping
To: glorygirl
Thanks for the heads up!
To: Alamo-Girl
Your welcome for all the thanks!! (Makes me feel guilty for not thanking all the people who ping me!!)
To: glorygirl
I usually post a "Thanks for the heads up!" but it probably should be a "Thanks, and here's a bump!" LOL!
To: glorygirl
Our concern is WHY he is a powerful voice in the Senate. Has THAT power decided it is time to stop forking around and let the sheeple hear the truth?
To: glorygirl
"Despite [Specter's] image popularized by Oliver Stone in "JFK," and the "Scottish Law" comment, he is a very powerful member of the Senate. He could never have remained there all these years if that wasn't the case." That he might be "a very powerful member of the Senate" is more of a statement about the Senate than about McSpecter, methinks.
29
posted on
09/07/2002 10:42:38 PM PDT
by
okie01
To: Alamo-Girl
You know, I've never really fully understood the "bump" thing. Is bump supposed to mean, "Yes, I agree?"
I know people often post BTTT, which I always thought meant back to the top, like a ping, but people also seem to use that in the "Yes, I agree" context, often followed by lots of exclamation points!!!!!
Maybe you can clarify. I'd appreciate it.
To: glorygirl
People "bump" or "bttt" a thread in order to recommend it to anyone browsing through the "most recent" posts. The recommendation does not necessarily mean they agree (though that would be most common IMHO) - they could be bringing attention to an outrageous piece of journalism.
To: okie01; justshutupandtakeit
"That he might be "a very powerful member of the Senate" is more of a statement about the Senate than about McSpecter, methinks." "Has THAT power decided it is time to stop forking around and let the sheeple hear the truth?"
If either of you two can ever figure out Arlen Specter,(especially in advance of him taking any particular action) please let me know.
He is probably the most enigmatic member of the Senate, and has been for a long time.
But we do know this: Bush is desperate to win Pennsylvania in '04, and has been taking many trips there.
If Specter is asking for information about the case, and a reporter managed to find out about it, there's probably a reason. Beyond that I'm not willing to speculate.
To: Alamo-Girl
Thanks, Alamo-Girl. I never really understood and now I do!
Grateful to have learned something.
To: glorygirl
You're quite welcome (this is another form of "stealth bumping" LOL!)
To: Alamo-Girl
Absolutely bump!!!(lol)
To: glorygirl
Another stealth bump for glorygirl.
To: okie01
Yesterday I watched a program on A&E called "Investigative Reports" (2 pm central) that connected
some of the dots between the first WTC bombing and 9/11. They did not mention OKC, though. But Woolsey was interviewed, and I had the distinct impression that he had already resigned by April 19, 1995. I think he said February of that year? Woolsey, in diplomatically veiled comments, seemed not particularly enamored of Bill Clinton.
BTW, A&E typically reruns these things a lot--if you get a chance, watch this one. I recorded it for future reference (but not on videotape). It's typical liberal feel-good stuff by and large, yet small bits of truth manage to shine through. What I found most startling was the Gary Hart interview, when he was asked: what will it take to wake up the country to this threat? And he replied, the next attack, and, he added, there will be one.
To: glorygirl
He is probably the most enigmatic member of the Senate, and has been for a long time. Heh! For my money he's an enema wrapped in an enigma. ; )
stealth bump
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Terry Nichols contacted Iraqi intelligence in the Philippines to acquire bomb-making expertise. A lot of eInk has been devoted to talking about whether the truck bomb could have brought down the Murrah building. Not much has been devoted to how the bombers selected a building with a specific structural weakness, susceptible to this kind of bomb.
Sounds to me like someone had access to construction experts.
39
posted on
09/09/2002 7:58:13 AM PDT
by
js1138
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson