Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

59 Socialists in Congress – 2002
The Sierra Times ^ | 09. 6. 02 | Chuck Morse

Posted on 09/07/2002 4:39:09 AM PDT by brityank

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-157 next last
To: brityank
Apparently our elected "capitalist" representatives and senators, who don't really represent us, don't have the courage to shine the light of day on these socialists. Doing so in this forum is good, but it should be spread to many forums to really spread the word. Well Done.
81 posted on 09/07/2002 12:10:37 PM PDT by ampat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Yes, so is Ron Paul. My challenge is to match the Red 59 with 59 non-socialists.

Perhaps we can find another HERE!

82 posted on 09/07/2002 1:28:56 PM PDT by Bigun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: brityank
...They will continue to refer themselves, and the nation as a democracy. In their ideology, fascism is what they can get away with, for now. Their next step, you've said it. A Freeconstituent Republic will not be tolerated...
83 posted on 09/07/2002 2:11:06 PM PDT by gargoyle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
This is absolutely amazing. I counted just 7 from NY/NJ/Pa. and five of those are from NY. Illinois has more lefties that NY.
84 posted on 09/07/2002 2:45:02 PM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: copycat
In a free capitalist society, this elitist enrichment also occurs, but at least the people are free to pursue their own best interests instead of having that interest subjugated to the state and ultimately the elite who control it.

Also, there are hungry want to be's who use the capitalist system to create new wealth for themselves. Elites in a capitalist system often don't stay at the top very long before they are replaced by new elites. Elites in a dictatorship have the ability to thwart potential competitors. Unfortunately, this leads to stagnating societies and economies.

85 posted on 09/07/2002 3:52:20 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Therefore, Lenin reasoned (correctly, see "What is to Be Done?") that Red terror before, during, and after the revolution would be required to whip the people along, to get them to act against their will, against their culture, against their religion, and against human nature.

I wholeheartedly agree, My use of the term "practical" Communism was just a very abridged (and inexact) form of what you said.

86 posted on 09/07/2002 3:56:28 PM PDT by Fzob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7
This REALLY deserves to be posted again---Tell your friends:

The All Time Chilling Quote Of The Day


"The American People will never knowingly adopt Socialism,
but under the name of Liberalism
they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program
until one day America will be a Socialist Nation
without ever knowing how it happened----"
Who on earth would publicly say such a thing,you may ask yourself?
Norman Thomas, Six-Time Socialist Party Presidential Candidate
and One of the Founders of the ACLU.

He's Telling you their plans right there,for gods sake!

87 posted on 09/07/2002 4:01:36 PM PDT by Pagey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: adam stevens
Wasn't the issue World War I and Lenin's opposition?

Sure, my only point was that "practical" communism doesn't give a hoot about the so called socialist phase of the revolution. Practical communism is just state sponsored terror, repression and death to bring about the revolution.

Theoretical communism is bascally a circle jerk by a bunch of lefties to see who can come up with the best ideas to get the state to give someone else your property.

Yes, I'm being flippant.

88 posted on 09/07/2002 4:12:47 PM PDT by Fzob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Comunists are socialists who mean it.

My favorite defintion is:

A Communist is a Socialist with *your* gun.

89 posted on 09/07/2002 4:42:58 PM PDT by AdamSelene235
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: brityank
None from Virginia.
90 posted on 09/07/2002 4:47:33 PM PDT by VaBthang4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brityank
On the extreme left wing of the Democratic Party, The Progressive Caucus is affiliated with the Democratic Socialists of America, which, in turn, is the American affiliate of the Socialist International.

All the more reason to vote Republican. Throwing our votes away on fringe single-digit candidates will not right this wrong.

91 posted on 09/07/2002 4:51:17 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: brityank
Why are the majority black? Just an observation....nothing intended ;)
92 posted on 09/07/2002 5:18:15 PM PDT by chasio649
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brityank
bump
93 posted on 09/07/2002 6:14:43 PM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pagey
"The American People will never knowingly adopt Socialism, but under the name of Liberalism they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program until one day America will be a Socialist Nation without ever knowing how it happened----" Who on earth would publicly say such a thing,you may ask yourself?

--Norman Thomas, Six-Time Socialist Party Presidential Candidate and One of the Founders of the ACLU.

Chilling post repeat!

94 posted on 09/07/2002 10:56:42 PM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: FreedomFriend
Who's not a socialist? I know that Tom Tancredo is a trusted patriot.

Another list could be - who in Congress represents what is good for America. I could only think of one name to put on it. Tancredo.

95 posted on 09/07/2002 11:10:32 PM PDT by blueriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: brityank
Just look at Joe McCarthy smiling down on all these revelations: I never lost faith in you Joe.
96 posted on 09/07/2002 11:15:55 PM PDT by Uncle George
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
Conyers Frank Waxman Waters - but not Hastings - LOL
97 posted on 09/07/2002 11:17:58 PM PDT by 185JHP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Bigun
True about this list being posted as a thread here. But the past mumbers were 54, it has gone up to 59.
98 posted on 09/08/2002 6:28:27 AM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Uncle George
Senator Joseph McCarthy
99 posted on 09/08/2002 6:31:58 AM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Uncle George
Joe McCarthy was Right-By Chuck Morse
100 posted on 09/08/2002 6:38:13 AM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-157 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson