US Denies Report of Major Raid on Western Iraq

Here ya go, This will help

Last Updated: September 06, 2002 04:21 PM ET

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Pentagon on Friday dismissed a British newspaper report that 100 U.S. and British warplanes conducted a major air raid against an airfield in western Iraq that could be a prelude to war.

"When I read that article, I thought maybe we had another strike that I didn't know about," Air Force Brig. Gen. John Rosa told reporters in response to questions at a Pentagon briefing about a report in the London Daily Telegraph.

"There were 12 airplanes -- (they) dropped 25 weapons," he said of the attack by U.S. strike jets against a command-and-control post at a military airfield 240 miles west of Baghdad.

The report gained special attention because of speculation that President Bush is preparing an attack to oust President Saddam Hussein, whom Washington accuses of developing weapons of mass destruction and supporting international terrorism.

Thursday's attack, the most recent in an increasing series of exchanges, was reported by Reuters and other agencies on Thursday.

Rosa was not clear on the number of British and U.S. radar and other support aircraft which were in the air during the strike. But he questioned that 100 aircraft reported by the Telegraph were involved.

Another Pentagon official, who asked not to be identified, said fewer than two dozen aircraft -- including those which dropped precision-guided weapons -- were involved.

Both Rosa, a senior officer on the U.S. military's Joint Staff, and Pentagon spokeswoman Victoria Clarke suggested that the report and other media reports in Britain had blown the raid out of proportion.

"People are trying to connect dots and patch things together to come to a conclusion. Don't read more into things that you've seen than you should," Clarke told reporters.

The U.S. military said on Thursday that the attack was the 35th of the year by U.S. and British jets against air defense targets in "no-fly" zones in northern and southern Iraq.

Iraq does not recognize the zones, set up after the 1991 Gulf War, to protect minority Kurds and Shiite Muslims from attack by Saddam's military.

While Iraqi attempts to shoot down western warplanes and attacks against ground targets have ebbed and flowed over the years, they have increased sharply in recent weeks with 10 air strikes in August, eight of them in the south.

The Daily Telegraph said 100 U.S. and British warplanes had taken part in the strike and that it was the largest raid in four years.

In its front-page report, the newspaper said the raid appeared to be a prelude to the type of special forces operation that would have to begin weeks before a possible American-led war.

"It (the raid) was bigger than the ones we had done in the last, probably, two weeks. But we have done strikes of that size several times over the last 10 or 11 years," said Rosa.

"And it was a strike on a critical command and control node, part of their air defense -- their integrated air defense system -- which is a pretty complex, sophisticated system."

Methinks there is more to this story, but to speculate on this wouldn't be prudent....... Loose lips sink ships

Pentagon to Left Wing Press: WE WILL SHOW YOU WHAT A REALLY BIG RAID IS IN COMING DAYS AND WEEKS.

This is just the pre-game exercise.

bingo

God Bless our Brave men and women who defend this great nation, My thoughts and prayers are with them as they conduct their missions. The words of our Commander-in Chief come to mind....

"The coarse of this conflict is not known, yet its outcome is certain. Freedom and fear, justice and cruelty, have always been at war, and we know that God is not neutral between them" George W. Bush Sept. 20th, 2001

In deference to the president, I think he meant "course"; though coarse it may be.

That was my bad, Not Dubya's :-)

I many times wonder how President Reagan would have dealt with this situation. Probably not much different than President Bush. However, on the communications side, I think maybe The Gipper might have coined things a bit better at this point. Here are some of my "fantasy" replies to the press Ronaldo Maximus might have made:

Donaldson: Mr. President, do you intend to seek UN approval for any action against Iraq?

POTUS: Well, Sam, when someone attacks a friend of ours, that's when we go to the UN. But when they attack us, we don't really see any need to do that.

Rather: Some have said, acused you, of ignoring the democrats on this entire matter. Are you an imperial president?

POTUS: Well Dan, we're still waiting on their decision about what they want to do about that attack on Iraq's neighbors in '91. If you remember, all they could agree on was to raise taxes here. (laughter)

POTUS: If I could direct my answer to the American people, Dan, I'd say, call your representatives. Put a candle in your window for one of our brave soliders or Marines. Send a letter to an airmen. Becuase, Dan, by the time you realize that we have removed Mr. Hussein's cold lifeless corpse from Bagdad, there will be a whole new generation of reporters and networks that will leave you wondering what happened to your audience. But perhaps I am getting ahead of myself. My advisors tell me that happens a lot. Next question.

The (mainstream press) is under the control of the evilones
in the democratic leadership (most notably Clinton). Bush is
cutting them out of the loop, these democrats are hateful evil bastards, and their constiuents are just plain idiots who cant think for themselves like unreasoning animals.