Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats for Regime Change *[Article Rush is talking about today]*
The Weekly Standard ^ | ADVANCE COPY from the September 16, 2002 issue | Stephen F. Hayes

Posted on 09/06/2002 9:58:16 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last
To: Grampa Dave
I loved it that Guilani told that Saudi Prince to stick it when he offered HIM the blood money.
21 posted on 09/06/2002 10:40:44 AM PDT by Matchett-PI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
Believe me! Copies are in route.


22 posted on 09/06/2002 10:40:52 AM PDT by sinclair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Hmmmmmm...

On Oct. 9,[1998] 27 senators sent Clinton a letter, initiated by Sens. Carl Levin (D-MI), Joseph Lieberman (D-CT), John McCain (R-AZ), and Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX), to “express [their] concern over recent developments in Iraq,” especially Iraq’s suspension of cooperation with the U.N.’s weapons inspection program. The letter urges Clinton “to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraq sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq’s refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs.”

In introducing the letter into the Congressional Record, Levin acknowledged the suffering that economic sanctions have caused the Iraqi people, saying it was “most unfortunate.” He also implicitly acknowledged that the sanctions policy has been a failure, saying that the sanctions were imposed to assure that Iraq’s “weapons of mass destruction programs be destroyed and that such destruction be accomplished under international supervision and permanent monitoring,” but that President Saddam Hussain has not complied for more than seven years. Levin and the other signers seemed to be advocating the politician’s prescription for fixing a failed policy: continue with the same policy, but more so.

Signers of the letter, in addition to Levin, Lieberman, McCain, and Hutchison, were Senators Kit Bond (R-MO), John Breaux (D-LA), Alfonse D’Amato (R-NY), Tom Daschle (D-SD), Chris Dodd (D-CN), Pete Domenici (R-NM), Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Wendell Ford (D-KY), Chuck Grassley (R-IO), Jesse Helms (R-NC), James Inhofe (R-OK), Daniel Inouye (D-HI), Tim Johnson (D-SD), Bob Kerrey (D-NE), John Kerry (D-MA), Jon Kyl (R-AZ), Mary Landrieu (D-LA), Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ), Dick Lugar (R-IN), Barbara Mikulski (D-MD), Rick Santorum (R-PA), Arlen Specter (R-PA), and Strom Thurmond (R-SC).

Washington Report

23 posted on 09/06/2002 10:41:17 AM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: breakem
heck, Rush even quoted Ayn Rand yesterday...he is trying to improve!
24 posted on 09/06/2002 10:42:12 AM PDT by Mark Felton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
When Guilani told the Opecker Prince Plick to take his check and shove it where the sunlight didn't shine, that was the beginning of the end of the Opeckers when added to 9/11.
25 posted on 09/06/2002 10:44:06 AM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Bump.
26 posted on 09/06/2002 10:45:07 AM PDT by Rocko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
wow, quality two days in a row! LOL!
27 posted on 09/06/2002 10:45:09 AM PDT by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: sinclair
I have my copies ready for Babbling Boxer and ChiFi FrankenStein if they start to play games with this critical issue.

Da$$hole should get thousands of these everyday from conservatives and moderates in his home state. Each one should ask "How much Opecker money did it take to make you change your mind?" "Was fourty pieces of Opecker Silver enough?"
28 posted on 09/06/2002 10:46:35 AM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
A "George W Bush has once again taken the entire Democratic party to school" bump
29 posted on 09/06/2002 10:48:42 AM PDT by The G Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Daschle is such a bald-faced liar!! Sheesh...I CANNOT STAND THAT MAN!

And this stupid dog-and-pony show up in NY today really pisses me off. They've (the congresscriters) have been off for the entire month of August. They had a short week this week with Monday a holiday and now this!! Criminy, there is boatloads of legislation to get done, appropriations to be made, nominees to be confirmed, etc. and what does the stupid Congress do? They take the day off, head up to New York so they look solemn and serious for the American people. They all make me sick. Get to work you lazy bums!!

30 posted on 09/06/2002 10:51:13 AM PDT by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
I just emailed this article to Brit Hume. Let's see if he uses it.
31 posted on 09/06/2002 10:52:14 AM PDT by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
As much as I'm enjoying Rush clobbering Daschle et al. for hypocrisy, there is a difference between the situation then and the situation now. In 1998, Senators knew that any "military intervention" Clinton undertook would be limitied to lobbing a smart bomb or two down some Arab's tent or the local aspirin factory. Now, they know that if Dubya goes in to Iraq, it's for keeps -- he's serious and he will kick serious butt. And of course, that will make them look like the craven, whining poltroons that they truly are. Bad show that -- especially what with mid-term elections coming up and all that....
32 posted on 09/06/2002 10:52:39 AM PDT by Cincinatus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
I'd love to see Bush give an entire speech to the Congress that is nothing but quotes by Dems supporting a war.

Then at the end of the speech, explain he used only Dem quotes.

33 posted on 09/06/2002 10:52:44 AM PDT by jigsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter
Thank you for posting this, Levin had an OpEd piece in the Detroit News on monday, opposing action in Iraq.

Letter to the Editor time.

34 posted on 09/06/2002 10:53:27 AM PDT by BOBTHENAILER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer; Grampa Dave; floriduh voter
Daschle is a Traitor ping.

Great post OEB. I went to lunch seething over Daschle's pu$$y stance of late, turned on Rush and knew immediately what was coming.

These putrid stinking lying hypocritical abortion candidate sub-humans, think that no one will care what their position was a short four years ago. I suppose they think that we are all medicare subsidized takers of prozac whose minds have been turned to mush by all the free medications.

I GOT NEWS FOR THEM.

35 posted on 09/06/2002 11:00:49 AM PDT by BOBTHENAILER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doug Loss
Of course the Democrats will say that this only applied to their president, not to any old president.

Wouldn't you just love to see Bush or Ari Fleischer say to the presstitutes.....

"No, we feel very comfortable with the resolution sponsored by the Democrates back in 1998. Yes, that's right, we think it was well worded and contained all the support we need."

36 posted on 09/06/2002 11:06:49 AM PDT by BOBTHENAILER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
More demoncrat hypocrisy here...

Text Of President Clinton's Address to the Nation on the Bombing of Iraq

December 16, 1998

http://www.newsmax.com/articles/?a=1998/12/17/70745
37 posted on 09/06/2002 11:09:13 AM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
Considering the views these Democrats expressed four years ago, why the current reluctance to support President Bush?

Who knows?

Yes, the answer that is staring everybody in the face, but few seem willing to publicly acknowledge, is that the Democrat leadership has little interest in pursuing America's interests - indeed the word "traitor" may not be too strong for some of them - and their only interest is in maintaining and/or growing their personal power, regardless of the damage that their actions will inflict on the nation.

38 posted on 09/06/2002 11:09:55 AM PDT by The Electrician
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Time for some of your great graphic art collection showing the Da$$hole in reality not what the Rat media shows him as.
39 posted on 09/06/2002 11:11:43 AM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123; Sabertooth; MeeknMing; JohnHuang2; PhiKapMom; Howlin; Miss Marple; firebrand; ...
Text Of President Clinton's Address to the Nation on the Bombing of Iraq

Thank you sir. Now is the time to pile on, hit below the the belt, etc., etc.,

You guys gotta check this thread out and spread it around.

40 posted on 09/06/2002 11:15:26 AM PDT by BOBTHENAILER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson