Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PhiKapMom
Inhofe said a public debate was unnecessary.

Of course not! Now, lets all bow, scrape, and lick boot . . .

4 posted on 09/06/2002 7:31:02 AM PDT by realpatriot71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: realpatriot71
I think there should be debate but not in public. We elected these people so let them do their job. A public debate just gives grandstanding RATS another opportunity to castigate President Bush for political points. It also gives them too much opportunity to allow classified info to be out in the public domain. If they are behind closed doors, they will make better decisions. TV cameras just make the congressional B-movie actors come forward.
6 posted on 09/06/2002 7:40:48 AM PDT by Wait4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: realpatriot71
Let's see, where was the public debate about Guadalcanal? About North Africa? About D-Day?

It is nonsense to think you can wage a war with "public debate" about every battle. Unless, of course YOU don't think we are a) at war or b) should win . . . .

28 posted on 09/06/2002 9:15:36 AM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson