Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.N. Spy Photos Show New Building at Iraqi Nuclear Sites
New York Times ^ | 9/06/02 | JULIA PRESTON

Posted on 09/06/2002 2:59:18 AM PDT by kattracks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last
To: kattracks
BUT BUT BUT, Semenstain said we need to get Osama first before we can prevent nuclear terroism. ``Saddam Hussein didn't kill 3,100 people on Sept. 11,'' he said. ``Osama bin Laden did, and as far as we know he's still alive.''

SCUMBAG
21 posted on 09/06/2002 6:34:31 AM PDT by finnman69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
"I am Beelzebubba, the ;man of sin', the false prophet, and the chief resident of the lake of fire! Give your soul to me, and I will grant your wishes!"
22 posted on 09/06/2002 7:52:07 AM PDT by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: putupon
Darnit, you beat me to it! *I* was gonna say baby milk factory for all the nice nuclear weapons engineers kids!
23 posted on 09/06/2002 7:54:26 AM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse
Ritter is dead meat politically.

As so many "friends" of the Clintons found out so it goes with the Democrats, he is a piece of trash walking...
24 posted on 09/06/2002 8:13:34 AM PDT by Vidalia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse
I would lay odds on that Ritter was either set up with a prosti or was caught boinking someone else's wife.

After being shown the audio/video evidence of his dalliance, "POOF!", he became an instant Dem puppet...
25 posted on 09/06/2002 8:20:27 AM PDT by Vidalia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: sheik yerbouty
LOL
26 posted on 09/06/2002 8:22:19 AM PDT by L,TOWM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TheRightGuy
Russia and China have already announced they intend to veto.

Really? I hadn't heard that. Even if true, I still hold by my original analysis. Vetoing a Security Council Resolution in favor of US military action would run counter to their strategic interests. China, especially, is dependent on goodwill in the US Congress. Were they to exercise their veto, that goodwill would vanish and they'd be screwed. Russia, conceivably, could veto the effort, especially given their current relations with Saddam, but Pooty-Poot's relationship with Bush would be shot, and I imagine the favor of the United States is a little more important to them than the favor of Baghdad.

27 posted on 09/06/2002 8:28:20 AM PDT by andy_card
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: andy_card
I hope you're right.
28 posted on 09/06/2002 8:50:05 AM PDT by FreeTheHostages
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: andy_card
Perhaps, but 8 billion ain't nothing to sneeze over.
29 posted on 09/06/2002 9:18:32 AM PDT by mikhailovich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: mikhailovich
Perhaps, but 8 billion ain't nothing to sneeze over.

According to the latest US Census Bureau Foreign Trade Statistics, Russia has an annual $3.6-5.6 billion (over-the-counter) trade surplus with the US. In addition, we give them billions more in aid, and bail them out whenever they suffer major fiscal crises. That's a lot more than Iraq can offer them.

30 posted on 09/06/2002 9:37:21 AM PDT by andy_card
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

Comment #31 Removed by Moderator

To: andy_card
What did we bail them out of?
32 posted on 09/06/2002 11:28:17 AM PDT by mikhailovich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
I just don't think bin laden could've kept his trap shut for this long. With all that's going on now? No way is he alive.
33 posted on 09/06/2002 11:56:06 AM PDT by knak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: andy_card
...I imagine the favor of the United States is a little more important to them than the favor of Baghdad....

I think there is money involved. I think Putin will agree to everything with the condition that the new Iraq must pay the zillions it owes Russian companies for weapons provided decades ago. The Soviets sold, but didn't know how to collect. Iraq is rich and there will be plunder to dole out for years in the future. Putin wants what he is owed. it's iccredible to believe but the Soviets just couldn't get the hang of foreign trade, especially the part about collecting the receivable.

Plain old precinct politics. Back scratching and money.

34 posted on 09/06/2002 1:34:42 PM PDT by bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
What the heck is this story doing coming from the UN?

Where did they get these photos? The UN doesn't have satellites.

Can't we study our own photos and show them to the world?
35 posted on 09/06/2002 2:06:31 PM PDT by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse
I wonder whether Scott Ritter is back with the program (literally and figuratively).

I heard this at the end of one of the cable shows last night (don't ask me which one)--Ritter is going back to Iraq and will be speaking to the Iraqi Congress (or whatever it's called). I do hope that we don't admit him back into the country after his visit.

36 posted on 09/06/2002 2:13:43 PM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"We want to open any door we want to open,"

A graduate of the Yogi Berra Academy of Rhetoric.

37 posted on 09/06/2002 2:16:42 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
U.N. Spy Photos Show New Building at Iraqi Nuclear Sites

U.S satellite that they U.N have

38 posted on 09/06/2002 4:39:06 PM PDT by USA21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: myrabach
condos!

Right. They're called the Nuclear Arms.

39 posted on 09/06/2002 4:54:05 PM PDT by PoisedWoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"United Nations inspectors are equipped, trained and ready to go to Iraq and could begin their work within weeks if Baghdad gave permission."

Read between the lines...

Saddam here is your free pass. Just permit inspectors in and you have another year to figure out how to Nuke New York City or DC.

40 posted on 09/06/2002 6:55:49 PM PDT by VaBthang4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson