To: KeyBored
Thank you. I figured the fact, that, well gee, SADDAM WASN"T even born when the Titanic sank might have been the first clue to my sarcasm.
Oh Well...
I guess I'll have to be careful about making that connection between Saddam, and that Meteor that wiped out the Dinosaurs.
I'll be sure to include the /sarcasm thing in that post...
To: Lord_Baltar
I for one am willing to consider conspiracy things beyond McVeigh and Nichols in OKC. However, any theory not only has to place someone "there," but has to explain why McVeigh totally and completely rejected such suggestions---the man had nothing to lose!---and why Nichols, with everything to gain, STILL has had his lawyers not take this tack.
In short, the two people with the most to gain by having a foreign involvement, and the two with the most to lose by being the sole culprits, have both rejected the notion that anyone else was involved. As I say, I'm certainly open to evidence, and would be, well, not happy to hear that Saddam was involved, but it wouldn't surprise me. But being "unsurprised" is not the same as convinced.
8 posted on
09/05/2002 5:09:54 AM PDT by
LS
To: Lord_Baltar; dighton; Orual; general_re
Lord Haw Haw : Hitler = Lord X : Saddam.
Students, please identify "X".
10 posted on
09/05/2002 5:13:16 AM PDT by
aculeus
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson