Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KeyBored
Thank you. I figured the fact, that, well gee, SADDAM WASN"T even born when the Titanic sank might have been the first clue to my sarcasm.

Oh Well...

I guess I'll have to be careful about making that connection between Saddam, and that Meteor that wiped out the Dinosaurs.

I'll be sure to include the /sarcasm thing in that post...
7 posted on 09/05/2002 5:02:21 AM PDT by Lord_Baltar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Lord_Baltar
I for one am willing to consider conspiracy things beyond McVeigh and Nichols in OKC. However, any theory not only has to place someone "there," but has to explain why McVeigh totally and completely rejected such suggestions---the man had nothing to lose!---and why Nichols, with everything to gain, STILL has had his lawyers not take this tack.

In short, the two people with the most to gain by having a foreign involvement, and the two with the most to lose by being the sole culprits, have both rejected the notion that anyone else was involved. As I say, I'm certainly open to evidence, and would be, well, not happy to hear that Saddam was involved, but it wouldn't surprise me. But being "unsurprised" is not the same as convinced.

8 posted on 09/05/2002 5:09:54 AM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Lord_Baltar; dighton; Orual; general_re
Lord Haw Haw : Hitler = Lord X : Saddam.

Students, please identify "X".
10 posted on 09/05/2002 5:13:16 AM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson