To: Straight Vermonter; *OKCbombing; Alamo-Girl; Gary Aldrich; amom; archy; aristeides; AtticusX; ...
The WSJ picked up Crogan's story in LAWeekly a month or two ago, but handled it with kid gloves.
I guess this means that the Bush administration is somehow going to use this when he lays out his "reasoning" for an invasion of Iraq next week. Notice how no adminstration officials are quoted.Do we really believe nobody was questioned?
At any rate, kids, this is a major editorial in a major paper. I hope others follow suit.
To: glorygirl
Indeed. Thanks for the heads up!
To: glorygirl
Thanks for all of the heads up GloryGirl..
To: glorygirl
At any rate, kids, this is a major editorial in a major paper. I hope others follow suit. Me,too. An Iraqi connection to the OKC bombings could help me make sense of Bush's recent rhetoric.
To: glorygirl
BBTTT !
77 posted on
09/05/2002 7:45:04 PM PDT by
lawdog
To: glorygirl
At any rate, kids, this is a major editorial in a major paper. I hope others follow suit. To be hypertechnical, this is a column by a senior editorial page writer at the WSJ (Morrison). However, it is endorsed by the editorial "Making the Iraq Case" that appeared on the same editorial page of yesterday's WSJ.
To: glorygirl
"At any rate, kids, this is a major editorial in a major paper. I hope others follow suit."
They won't. Go to the other thread on "connection" and read the last three posts!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson