[Wm Bach]

In short, the two people with the most to gain by having a foreign involvement, and the two with the most to lose by being the sole culprits, have both rejected the notion that anyone else was involved.

And yet one of those two people, portrayed by the government as a right wing, white supremecist, militia-type, penned an eloquent defense of Iraq as his swan song.

Consider then that he may have been protecting "others unkown" rather than being a rat because he truly sypathized with the Iraqi cause, as his own words would indicate. "Lily White" may have also been protecting his sister from suffering retribution, should he have outed the identies of his handlers.

[LS]

Well, your explanation would certainly make sense. However, it would require a great deal of evidence to support the notion that this one time soldier AGAINST Iraq suddenly and completely shifted gears, so much so that he would kill innocent people in America (as opposed to, say, enlisting in the Iraqi army). Moreover, it means that he lied when he wrote about the hatred of "big government" as his reason for OK City.

As I say, I would be open to genuine evidence on this as opposed to speculation. But his dad said nothing about this; nor did Nichols. Only this one letter.