[LS]

I think your post may have been meant for someone else, but let me re-state: I'm OPEN to such a possibility, but skeptical, given that essentially (in one form or another) FOUR juries have looked at evidence and never rendered a verdict consistent with anyone but McVeigh and Nichols being the culprits.

[aristeides]

I thought the indictments in those trials were framed in such a way that there might have been unnamed other people involved. What about the prosecutions depended on there not being such other people?

[KC_Conspirator]

I think I meant to post to you and concur with your assessment that this is not compelling evidence.