To: KC_Conspirator
I think your post may have been meant for someone else, but let me re-state: I'm OPEN to such a possibility, but skeptical, given that essentially (in one form or another) FOUR juries have looked at evidence and never rendered a verdict consistent with anyone but McVeigh and Nichols being the culprits.
147 posted on
09/10/2002 1:12:14 PM PDT by
LS
To: LS
I thought the indictments in those trials were framed in such a way that there might have been unnamed other people involved. What about the prosecutions depended on there not being such other people?
To: LS
I think I meant to post to you and concur with your assessment that this is not compelling evidence.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson