I disagree. If someone in the Bush administration was behind this, it would have been on the front page, not the editorial page.
The WSJ took what it considers to be a big risk in covering this story, and, after watching that interview, I can see just worried the editors are about covering their backsides, in the event Bush chooses to ignore it.
I'm hopeful their desire to win a Pullitzer outweighs their concern about being labeled "tinfoilers."
At the same time, I'm hopeful they'll give credit where credit is due.
You really are a hopeful girl. I commend you for your positive thoughts. But it was only the single bullet theory and Arlern Sphincter until the sheeple were deeply asleep enough to spill a little more. It seems like it's all under control, and this story will dissappear soon I fear, Fox seems to have dropped it already. It's not even on John Gibson's section on the web. This is not to be touched, although it would serve to convince the moronic public that we should drop SadMan.......as if we didn't have enough reason. I really think this is not just about oil as some say, I think we want, in the end, the peoples of the mideast to throw off their iron-fisted rulers, and become democracies. Then we have more people to do business with. More LOOT!