Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fred Mertz
The simple answer? He has not complied with any of the agreements he "agreed" to follow in return for us stopping the rightious ass-kicking we were laying on him...

Complex answer? If this man get's nuclear technology, I'd say it's safe to bet that we would be hit... or Israel would... either way, that would not be good...

Legally, we may not have much of a leg to stand on, but morally I feel we do... but maybe that's just me :0)

26 posted on 09/04/2002 7:42:22 PM PDT by Chad Fairbanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Chad Fairbanks
Legally, we may not have much of a leg to stand on, but morally I feel we do... but maybe that's just me :0)

Oh, we've got all the legality we need in SJ Res 23. Congress authorized Bush to be the sole arbiter of who or what was involved in 9/11, and to take military action based upon his conclusions alone.

"International law," of course, does not exist. They can write up all the pretty little UN resolutions and pacts and treaties they want, but at the end of the day, the US government is only responsible to the US Constitution.

96 posted on 09/04/2002 8:14:42 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson