[Moby Grape]

Okay..you guys win...let's just all die from nuclear or chemical attack...Boy, will we all be FREE then!!!!

[Cato]

You are Not very smart or you can't read.

You would have loved "The Enabling Act".

CATO

[Cato]

You guys????

Lets try this again. You upset me with your flippant answer. I apolgise.

Ashcroft/Bush say:

"From page three of these ASHCROFT terrorism FBI guidelines":

"The nature of the conduct engaged in by a [terrorist] enterprise will justify an inference that the standard [for opening a criminal justice investigation] is satisfied, even if there are NO KNOWN STATEMENTS by participants that ADVOCATE or INDICATE PLANNING for violence or other prohibited acts." (Emphasis added.) That conduct can be simply "intimidating" the government, according to the USA Patriot Act.

You want to tell me how you can infer anything when NO STATEMENT is made by the participants that ADVOCATE OR INDICATE they are PLANNING for violence or other prohibited acts?????

How about that, "The nature of the conduct engaged in by a [terrorist] enterprise.."

Listen, the nature of a terrorist organization is it's ACTIONS.

MERELY???,that conduct can be simply "intimidating" the government, according to the USA Patriot Act.

The government CAN NOT be intimidated. It has the BIG, BIGGER, BIGGEST GUNS in town and all this talk of intimidation is BS my man and Insulting.

Bush and Gang just want silence from the people and it will be bought at any Cost, according to their own literature. Shame on them and Shame on you for supporting this.

All it takes for evil to triumph is for good men to do or "SAY/WRITE" nothing.

Regards,
CATO

[Cato]

You guys????

Lets try this again. You upset me with your flippant answer. I apolgise.

Ashcroft/Bush say:

"From page three of these ASHCROFT terrorism FBI guidelines":

"The nature of the conduct engaged in by a [terrorist] enterprise will justify an inference that the standard [for opening a criminal justice investigation] is satisfied, even if there are NO KNOWN STATEMENTS by participants that ADVOCATE or INDICATE PLANNING for violence or other prohibited acts." (Emphasis added.) That conduct can be simply "intimidating" the government, according to the USA Patriot Act.

You want to tell me how you can infer anything when NO STATEMENT is made by the participants that ADVOCATE OR INDICATE they are PLANNING for violence or other prohibited acts?????

How about that, "The nature of the conduct engaged in by a [terrorist] enterprise.."

Listen, the nature of a terrorist organization is it's ACTIONS.

MERELY???,that conduct can be simply "intimidating" the government, according to the USA Patriot Act.

The government CAN NOT be intimidated. It has the BIG, BIGGER, BIGGEST GUNS in town and all this talk of intimidation is BS my man and Insulting.

Bush and Gang just want silence from the people and it will be bought at any Cost, according to their own literature. Shame on them and Shame on you for supporting this.

All it takes for evil to triumph is for good men to do or "SAY/WRITE" nothing.

Regards,
CATO