Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mhking
Your point about section 3 assumes that free states trying to seceed were guilty of sedition while Lincoln wasn't. Who was the true enemy of the constitution?
112 posted on 09/04/2002 2:37:40 PM PDT by HaveGunWillTravel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]


To: HaveGunWillTravel
Your point about section 3 assumes that free states trying to seceed were guilty of sedition while Lincoln wasn't. Who was the true enemy of the constitution?

Legally? The individuals in those states were.

Morally? That's a much more nebulous situation where Lincoln could be equally culpable. Then again, there is the golden rule: he who has the gold makes the rules.

I don't claim to be anything more than a (below?) average constitutional scholar. And that's why I prefaced my answer with "If I'm understanding correctly" types of rejoinders. I'm definitely open for discussion on it...

116 posted on 09/04/2002 2:44:42 PM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson