Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Phaedrus; monkey; Askel5; medved; VadeRetro; Junior; Nebullis; beckett; logos; cornelis; ...
Thought you might find this interesting.... Wolfram certainly has some quite unusual and interesting insights into a subject matter that has seemed quite settled in biological science....
3 posted on 09/04/2002 11:27:36 AM PDT by betty boop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: betty boop
Wolfram's idea is new. It might replace much of the current thought on evolution versus creation. Goes off in a new direction.
6 posted on 09/04/2002 11:30:29 AM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: betty boop
Very interesting post! Thank you!
9 posted on 09/04/2002 11:33:23 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: betty boop
Thought you might find this interesting...

I do. I largely agree. I don't agree with Wolfram's pretense that these ideas are new. They are culled from the biology literature.

37 posted on 09/04/2002 6:22:38 PM PDT by Nebullis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: betty boop
I saw Wolfram recently on Charlie Rose, BB. Geez, he was all over the map. I sense a taste of the same problem in the quotes offered above. Wolfram has the pasty complexion and nervous, disconnected chatter of a guy who stays up all night every night staring at a computer screen and puzzling out the minute details of an arcane theory, which, if the articles I've read recently are to be believed, is exactly how he has lived for the past ten years.

I have yet to read the book. Judging by the above prose, it looks like it might be rough sledding, although I'm always happy to see somebody get a dig in on "random" natural selection.

What I really want to know, and what I haven't heard any of his peers yet weigh in on, is: Does he offer anything new?

Did you enjoy the book, BB?

40 posted on 09/04/2002 8:44:29 PM PDT by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: betty boop
Interesting idea; I forced myself to peruse the entire document, but I think that working outside of the scientific community was a bad idea. He doesn't seem very up-to-date on his ideas. That a simple computer program could emulate what we see in nature is hardly surprising. Have you looked at a spiderweb lately? The guy attacks the idea of survival of fittest in a couple of valid ways, but what he doesn't understand is that the theory does explain everything. He doesn't give enough ideas for me to accept them, and I doubt that most scientists will accept them either.
202 posted on 09/15/2002 8:50:00 PM PDT by Seeker204
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson