Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: betty boop
I am not worried that Wolfram might not have the answer and that he might have fallen prey to reductionism. He is trying for reductionism in a way, as do many theoretical physicists. Generalize by reducing.

If he is following Buddhism, that is not surprising. Several physicists I know are or call themselves Buddhists, and they are the quickest, most awesome physicists, nothing pedantic about them.

199 posted on 09/15/2002 4:32:05 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies ]


To: RightWhale
I am not worried that Wolfram might not have the answer and that he might have fallen prey to reductionism. He is trying for reductionism in a way, as do many theoretical physicists. Generalize by reducing.

I don't mean to suggest that what Wolfram does in this extraordinary book is worthless. Quite the contrary. I might like his methods, but still be unconvinced by some of the inferences he draws from his conclusions.

IMHO A New Kind of Science is simply a great and in many ways exceptionally elegant book. It has pride of place on my #1 bookshelf, right up there with the volumes of Eric Voegelin. And that's saying a lot, believe me. :^)

203 posted on 09/16/2002 7:58:49 AM PDT by betty boop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson