He blowed up REAL good!
Posted on 09/04/2002 7:06:05 AM PDT by family and nation
First post here, eh?
I believe you've wandered into the wrong forum.
For the record, Matt Bivens writes for the Nation. He is best remembered for the George-Bush-owns-the-Astros article where he linked Bush, through the Astros and Enron Field, to Ken Lay. The problem is that GWB owned the Texas Rangers.
Grilled by the media.
Right.
I guess the Moscow Times missed the part about Bill Clinton writing the letter in which he claimed to 'loathe' the military.
No mention of Al Gore's stunning record of bravery either...
Or Bubba's great escape from the draft.
He blowed up REAL good!
As far as his knees were concerned, he was 4-F; this was a medical decision and policy by the Army which made him ineligible for service. He was in ROTC at the time. The implication is that Buchanan "faked" bad knees; as someone who has also been denied the opportunity to serve because of bad knees, I know that there was not anything he could do to avoid it. It was just a lousy break.
If I hadn't already known that the author was a man, this sentence would have enlightened me. Matt Bivens--communist and ignorant flaming misogynist.
It was sure nice of Lynn Cheney's uterus to cooperate on such short notice, wasn't it? And this back in the days before ovulation predictor kits.
(Hint for Matt--she was already pregnant, you total idiot...)
Good God, you mean that clown couldn't even get his baseball teams straight?
Oh well.
The "Chickenhawk" angle is a thoroughly dishonest attempt to silence debate on the part of the left. This is a thoroughly disingenuous attempt by the left to elevate military opinion and military experience over civilian control. It's not that leftists actually value military experience; they loathe the military and the class of men who serve therein. However, the Left finds it expedient to use the military to peddle the following specious line of argument: only people with military experience have a thorough knowledge of what war is really like, therefore it is they who should have to decide on who lives and who dies. It follows from that line of reasoning that those who have never served should never be allowed to make the decision to send men and women into battle.
Neither George W. Bush nor Dick Cheney ever saw combat, ergo, they should not be allowed to make the decision to send men to war.
The Situational Ethics of the Left rears its head once again: were a Democrat sitting in the Oval Office, and he had no military experience (such as Franklin D. Roosevelt, for instance), the Left would be ready to back him up. As it stands, the Left is quite willing to stand the Constitution on its head, and go the Bonapartist route.
Situational Ethics in politics can lead one to Fascism. But that is understandable: the Left has always been far more comfortable with fascism than they have ever been willing to admit.
Be Seeing You,
Chris
This critter shows up regularly with names like God_Flag_and_Apple_Pie, Love_It_Or_Leave_It, John_Wayne_is_my_Hero, and so forth. He doesn't seem to fool anyone.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.