[dogbyte12]

And you are free to do so. You need never read or hear her again, but my issue is that I should have the OPTION to listen/read/see her as often as I am allowed to listen/read/see her counterparts. It is not 'fair and balanced' to censor one side of an arguement.

If you read the article closer, you will see that this paper carries other conservative columnists proudly, including Cal Thomas. The republic got on fine for a little while with conservative columnists not named Ann Coulter ya know.

[republicman]

I can't help notice how every thread about Ann Coulter brings the liberals to it like flies.

I guess she's got their number.

[the_doc]

If you read the article closer, you will see that this paper carries other conservative columnists proudly, including Cal Thomas. The republic got on fine for a little while with conservative columnists not named Ann Coulter ya know.

The Republic has not been doing "fine" since well before Clinton took office for the first time. Ann has risen into prominence for that very reason.

Ann is the Republic's quite proper reaction to the mess which the Cal Thomases have not effectively addressed.

(I like Cal Thomas. But we need to fight fire with fire. This country of ours is not a church.)