Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kinganamort
How would the issue have been resolved early if Hill didn't bring suit? The RATS would have brought an action when it had the greatest advantage for them. Where in the statute does it say that the 99.012(6) only applies to state office holders?
23 posted on 09/03/2002 12:28:14 PM PDT by Theyknow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Theyknow
The statue does apply, but the penalty for this case is clearly spelled out:

f)1. The failure of an officer who qualifies for federal public office to submit a resignation pursuant to this subsection constitutes an automatic irrevocable resignation, effective immediately, from the office he or she presently holds.

The penalty for possible removal from the ballot is questionalble as if it applies.

24 posted on 09/03/2002 12:36:47 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Theyknow
read it! and thats exactly what im saying it wouldnt have been, but since she didnt violate laws it didnt matter.
25 posted on 09/03/2002 12:51:47 PM PDT by kinganamort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson