Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chaosagent
My point is, if it were a syndication issue, even on the EIB's part, Medved would have known that. It very clearly was Rush's call and that's fine. Call it "protectiveness" if you don't want to call it insecurity. What you label it is really not relevant to me. All I was trying to do was explain to someone who Medved is and suddenly, I'm labeled as an irrational Rush-hater.
88 posted on 09/03/2002 1:03:02 PM PDT by soccermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]


To: soccermom
I'm not sure I or anyone else called you a "Rush Hater".

You said Rush was insecure because he wouldn't let Medved sub-host after he got his own national show.

I'm saying insecurity has nothing to do with it. It just isn't done on a national level. You won't find Medved subbing for Hannity either. Or Hannity for Medved. Or Hannity for O'Reilly. Or O'Reilly for Laura Ingrahm.

It just isn't done. And won't be. By anyone.
89 posted on 09/03/2002 1:41:38 PM PDT by chaosagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson