To: chaosagent
My point is, if it were a syndication issue, even on the EIB's part, Medved would have known that. It very clearly was Rush's call and that's fine. Call it "protectiveness" if you don't want to call it insecurity. What you label it is really not relevant to me. All I was trying to do was explain to someone who Medved is and suddenly, I'm labeled as an irrational Rush-hater.
To: soccermom
I'm not sure I or anyone else called you a "Rush Hater".
You said Rush was insecure because he wouldn't let Medved sub-host after he got his own national show.
I'm saying insecurity has nothing to do with it. It just isn't done on a national level. You won't find Medved subbing for Hannity either. Or Hannity for Medved. Or Hannity for O'Reilly. Or O'Reilly for Laura Ingrahm.
It just isn't done. And won't be. By anyone.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson