Uhoh RATS. looks like Biden is on board the Baghdad express.
1 posted on
09/02/2002 4:59:17 PM PDT by
finnman69
To: finnman69
This is total propaganda. Scott Ritter personally walked across every square inch of Iraq looking in every nook and cranny of Iraq's 167,975 square miles and he found no weapons. If Scott said that, it's good enough for me.
To: finnman69
I want the President to go to Congress and make every one of them to vote up or down on going into Iraq.
I want to know whos who.
3 posted on
09/02/2002 5:05:26 PM PDT by
mware
To: finnman69
Without getting into the merits (or lack thereof) of attacking Iraq, it's time this adminstration came out with a clear and public policy of how we will respond to a nuclear, chemical, or biological attack.
Preferrably, it would involve the total destruction (using nukes) of the nation (and anything they value) that launches, funds, or provides material for the weapons.
Our enemies and the rest of the world needs to know exactly what the consequences would be for engaging in hi-tech barbarian warfare against the United States.
Also, the treasonous policy of Klinton to "launch after impact" needs to be reversed immediately, if it has not already been done.
4 posted on
09/02/2002 5:06:03 PM PDT by
Mulder
To: finnman69
"If we wait for the danger to become clear, it could be too late," said Sen. Joseph Biden, D-Delaware, chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee.Yep, Bidens on board, Turkey and Kuwait are lining up and Russia says they will veto any resolution proposed by America to forcibly remove the Hussein Regime.
The time is drawing near.
6 posted on
09/02/2002 5:13:55 PM PDT by
jwalsh07
To: finnman69
I will review my assessment of Biden. Maybe he is only 90% an a**hole.
To: TLBSHOW
But wait. Shouldn't we be listening to the renowned world expert William Rivers Pitt?
To: finnman69
"If we wait for the danger to become clear, it could be too late," said Sen. Joseph Biden, D-DelawareBiden said this???!!! Did he check first to see he might be plagiarizing?
15 posted on
09/02/2002 5:36:31 PM PDT by
Eala
To: finnman69
huh...Iraq has tons of chem weapons, God knows what else....and now, golly gee, Hussein has had time to hide them...but WE didn't know that, did we? let see.....we knew he has em, so we threaten him first, so he can hide them, and then attack.
this is how serious people act in the face of a serious threat? on what planet?
32 posted on
09/02/2002 6:15:17 PM PDT by
galt-jw
To: finnman69
...if we wait for the danger to become clear, it could be too late," said Sen. Joseph Biden, D-Delaware....Or, the danger could become clear.
Sheesh.
To: finnman69
...Iraq continues to possess several tons of chemical weapons agents, enough to kill thousands and thousands of civilians or soldiers," said Jon Wolfsthal, an analyst with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.......later, after a dozen Scotches at the bar around the corner from Carnegie, Wolfsthal stunned journalists with some frank admissions. "Dammit, let's drop the Big One, now!' said the bleary eyed weapons expert. 'My Martin Marietta, Raytheon and McDonnell Douglas shares are, like, flatlining. And I promised my girlfriend we'd have a new skiboat for next summer. You know how much juice those 454s need?? Let's git it ON, man!'
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson