I don't call placing a civilian into a situation where an armed robber is expected to strike "protecting the public". I'd say that it is sheer luck that the perp didn't blow away the clerk and that they were able to apprehend him after the robbery, as they didn't find him until several hours afterwards. Two qualified detectives could have handled this, with one making the switch with the clerk and the other present outside the store in wait for the perp to leave. The arrest would have been handled by the detective outside the store with the "clerk" providing backup.
Now that is with only TWO officers, whereas it is apparent from your comments that they had a SWAT team waiting OUTSIDE the store. I find this sloppy, cowardly, and inept..
This illustrates clearly that THOSE officers , and TOO many other law enforcement officers feel their lives more important than the CITIZENS who pay their salaries.
I would love to see the clerk win a multi-million judgement against the PD, the officers individually, and his employer.They conspired to put him in harm's way, and in so doing, are WORSE than the punk robber.Company management often bray about providing a safe workplace , and on such grounds DENY the right to bear arms for self-defense. SInce the company apparently both denied this clerk the ability to defend himself AND knowingly placed him in harm's way, I think there is excellent cause for a lawsuit.