Skip to comments.
Baggy Pants Spark Controversy At Belleville High
Local 4 News - ClickonDetroit ^
| Aug 29, 2002
Posted on 08/30/2002 5:52:20 AM PDT by fivecatsandadog
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-171 next last
She said that she paid $75 for the pants that her son was suspended for wearing. "I will take him to another school district. I will do what I have to do. It's not fair to the kids," Charlene Byrd said. What an idiot. I have a better idea: suspend HER credit card.
To: fivecatsandadog
Exactly what I was thinking.
To: Bikers4Bush; fivecatsandadog
I second that motion.
3
posted on
08/30/2002 6:01:32 AM PDT
by
jjm2111
To: fivecatsandadog
I bet the teachers aren't lifting the shirts although I can't imagine why anyone cares unless their crack is showing.
4
posted on
08/30/2002 6:02:51 AM PDT
by
AppyPappy
To: fivecatsandadog
Matt Byrd said that he felt uncomfortable with having teachers lift up his shirt to see whehter his pants sagged. But walking around with his underwear hanging out doesn't bother him at all.
5
posted on
08/30/2002 6:03:11 AM PDT
by
Wolfie
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
To: fivecatsandadog
Students argue that the pants are part of the latest fashion trend and that they are comfortable.Latest trend, my foot. I've been waiting twenty years for this "trend" to finally go away. This "trend" began here before any of the students in this story were frickin' conceived.
ENOUGH ALREADY! Get yourselves some pants that FIT!
To: Wolfie
What right does a teacher have to even touch a student? He should have told the teacher to keep his hands to himself.
8
posted on
08/30/2002 6:07:28 AM PDT
by
ladylib
To: fivecatsandadog
Byrd's son, Matt, is one of the boys who has been suspended. She said that she paid $75 for the pants that her son was suspended for wearing.
"I will take him to another school district. I will do what I have to do. It's not fair to the kids," Charlene Byrd said. Haven't you gotten the memo yet, Charlene? There are no parental rights anymore. You don't get to decide what your minor children wear, the state does. You thought YOU were in charge of your son? You thought YOU made the decisions? Ha! To laugh! Your kids are property of the state. Your wishes are meaningless. You are only a parent. The state will tell you how to dress, what to feed, and how to discipline your children. Just submit and like it. It's easier that way.
To: ladylib
Talk to a teacher and find out for yourself what students try to "sneak" into the classroom. You'd be surprised.
10
posted on
08/30/2002 6:10:18 AM PDT
by
smiley
To: fivecatsandadog
Years ago I worked in a clothes store. A little kid about knee high to a duck comes in looking for pants; couldn't have been more than 13-14. Wanted that "baggy" look. He should have been in the young boys section, his waist was probably 24-26" - but he buys a pair of 36" pants!
I asked him how are you gonna fit in those, son? "It's the style - they're cool," was all he said.
Two days later Mamma comes in the store, an embarassed Junior in tow. Mom returned the pants stating they were the "wrong size"!
To: southern rock
Kind a funny, isn't it? If they were asking him to whip it out and urinate into a cup in full view of a pee collector, everybody'd be applauding.
12
posted on
08/30/2002 6:21:11 AM PDT
by
Wolfie
To: smiley
Talk to a teacher and find out for yourself what students try to "sneak" into the classroom. You'd be surprised.
The reason gangters where these baggy pants on the street is so that their handgun does not produce a bulge in their pants that would tip off the police.
13
posted on
08/30/2002 6:21:22 AM PDT
by
LetsRok
To: southern rock
MAN OVERBOARD!
To: LetsRok
The reason gangters where these baggy pants on the street is so that their handgun does not produce a bulge in their pants that would tip off the police. So technically, the 2nd amendment ought to have eliminated the need for baggy pants long ago. Hmmm.
To: fivecatsandadog
I will take him to another school district This is the appropriate way to handle the situation in a free market...Oh, I forgot, the public schools are a monopoly. She probably won't be able to do this legally without moving.
To: Joe Boucher
"This stupid idiot parent backs her sons behavior"
Exactly. Seems to me that if some people had more COMMON SENSE and RESPECT, they wouldn't have to be so worried about their "rights" being violated. It's all ME, ME, ME, ME these days.
To: ladylib
What right does a teacher have to even touch a student? He should have told the teacher to keep his hands to himself. In my day, the teachers still administered corporal punishment. I wouldn't have dared to tell my dad that I had gotten a spanking in school because I would've gotten another one from him. School was a civil place back then, whether our rights were violated or not- I don't know. I know my parents condoned the teachers warming my backside if I felt like it was ok to ruin other kids education.
To: fivecatsandadog
Seems to me that if some people had more COMMON SENSE and RESPECT, they wouldn't have to be so worried about their "rights" being violated.I love it! Forget you have rights, and you won't be upset when they are taken away. Perfect!
To: southern rock
There is a school district in CA that has taken it upon itself to confiscate junk food that students bring from home for lunch. One teacher said she would tell a student to bring an apple rather a bag of chips and confiscate the chips. Who the hell is she to tell a student what to bring to school to eat? You better believe that parents are losing their rights.
20
posted on
08/30/2002 6:38:33 AM PDT
by
ladylib
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-171 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson