Hey, this is your little fairy tale. I am assuming that you got the information from somewhere, rather than just making it up. I'm asking for a credible source. If Dr. Reisman attempted to get a study published and a journal refused to publish it, then either you're a member of that journal's editorial board, or you heard about it from some source.
Yes, frivolous lawsuits are indeed difficult to win.
Now you're working from Page One of the Official Left-Wing Playbook. You're distorting what I said into something stupid and shoving it back into my face. I didn't say that it was a frivolous suit. Defamation and libel suits are difficult to win.
An (allegedly unbiased) researcher taking part in a secret political conference… yeah, I’d say that’s pretty darn suspicious, especially since the topic was one on which she claims to be an expert. If her “science” stood on its own, she wouldn’t need to attend political planning sessions.
You're the one claiming that this conference was "secret." You're also the one claiming that it was "political." And you're the one claiming that it was a "planning session." Once again: credible link, please.
My guess is that you're getting all of these so-called "facts" from a left-wing propaganda website -- most likely a gay rights site -- and you're refusing to reveal it because the left-wing pro-homosexual bias will be so obvious that you'll instantly lose any shred of credibility.
But hey, I could be wrong about that.
In the case of the Dale vs the Boy Scouts, the poster uses information from the American Psychological Association.
As Dr. Cameron pointed out, the American Psychological Association has misrepresented scientific evidence before the Supreme Court and the State Supreme Courts of Virginia and Wyoming.
The perversion lobby has the American Psychological Association behind them and maybe the other APA too.