That's not fair. You know who you are talking about, and we don't. Therefore you can make any statement you like, and you can extrapolate to the "weaknesses" of the anti-gay argument, and expound at length on guilt by association with your Unnamed Bespotted Unholy Presence in the ranks of the social conservatives -- but if we don't know who he is, we can't evaluate your charges for ourselves.
I think that's called debating with one arm tied behind your opponent's back.