I tend to think Reisman, Cameron, Bryan, et al are counter-productive in preventing sexual abuse of children. The logic goes that since these molestations are same-sex, therefore the perpetrators are homosexual. The conclusion is that we need to keep homosexuals away from kids.
Before the recent scandal in the Church, how many people would think "priest" when someone says the word "homosexual"? How many people would suspect a man who is married and has his own biological children when they hear the word "homosexual"? Noone suspects (or suspected) those people -- "homosexual" means the queen prancing at the head of the Gay Pride parades.
I suspect that we have less to worry about from the queen than we do the priest or the married-man, if only because none would suspect them. One may hold his kid back from a camping-trip led by the queen, but who gives a second-thought to the man leading a trip that includes his own son?
Less effort should be spent demonizing homosexuals and more on actually protecting kids. Stuff such ensuring that NO adult is ever alone with a kid in personal moments such as sleeping, toileting, showering, etc. Ensuring kids know "good touch/bad touch". Ensuring kids know enough about sex that they aren't likely to be misled by a "trusted" non-family member.
I do not believe that people who identify as homosexual are the disproportionately large threat that these people are trying to make them out to be.