So, Josh, what's your bottom line? Bryan and Reisner and Cameron and everyone else should just furl their banners and quit the field? That we should all just get used to it? That we should all make an effort to improve ourselves before pointing fingers, and commit ourselves to really giving ourselves a chance to rise above our heterosexist breeder narrowness? And discover what warm, wonderful people gays are, even when they're dating our kids and bringing them home with STD's?
What's the bottom line, Josh?
How about "the truth"? How about acknowledging that all squares (people who identify as homosexual) are parallelograms (people who commit homosexual acts), but not all parallelograms are squares.
That's what it boils down to and any study, meta-analysis, or essay that fails to keep squares and rectangles and parallelograms straight is bogus. 1-2% identify as homosexual, yet 30-40% have committed at least one homosexual act -- that's a world of difference when crunching numbers.
JCG- (#116) I didn't "narrow" the definition; I used one of Bryan's two. 1-2% of the population identifies as homosexual; 30-40% of the population has committed a homosexual act -- which group does Gacy, Cohn, and Liberace fall into?