Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DrLiberty
bump
3 posted on 08/29/2002 1:45:03 PM PDT by WhiskeyPapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: WhiskeyPapa
The report seriously questions whether or not the suspect hijackers, supposedly trained on Cessna light aircraft, could have located a target dead-on 200 miles from take off point.

GPS. Flight Management Systems. Simulators.

Actually, the two WTC hijackers nearly collided over the water while on the "final approach" to the Twin Towers. They weren't THAT good.

It further throws into doubt their ability to master the intricacies of the instrument flight rules (IFR) in the 45 minutes from take off to the point of impact.

They weren't "in the system," i.e., flying according to IFR. The day was VMC (visual meteorological conditions), or severe clear. Just because commercial airlines are required to fly under IFR doesn't mean that a hijacker of a commercial airline is gonna follow the rules! Sheesh.

A further question raised by the inquiry was why none of the pilots concerned had alerted ground control. It stated that all pilots are trained to punch a four-digit code into the flight control’s transponder to warn ground control crews of a hijacking - but this did not happen.

Because they were dead.

And for good measure, I'm sure the hijackers either popped the circuit breakers for the transponder or just turned it off.

11 posted on 08/29/2002 1:52:33 PM PDT by bootless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson