Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

City Attorney Says Charges Could Be Dropped Against (KMart) Arrestees
KPRC Channel 2 Houston ^ | August 28, 2002

Posted on 08/28/2002 1:02:00 PM PDT by Dog Gone

HOUSTON -- Houston's Police Chief C.O. Bradford addressed concerns Wednesday about a Kmart parking lot raid earlier this month in which dozens of people were arrested.

Video
Kmart Parking Lot Raid
Video Hear What Police Chief Has To Say
SURVEY
DISCUSSION
Click Here For Video Help

The raid happened Aug. 19 in the parking lot of a Kmart department store, located in the 8400 block of Westheimer Road, in southwest Houston.

HPD officials had previously said that it conducted the crackdown in response to numerous complaints from citizens and previous police surveillance regarding street racing and large crowds forming in the area.

Police said that these crowds impeded the access to and from businesses and that as a result of the operation 278 people were arrested with the majority being charged with criminal trespass.

"Zero tolerance does not override the need for probable cause to issue citations or to make arrests, nor does it mean to arrest everyone in sight," Bradford said.

Bradford answered some tough questions Wednesday for more than two hours by some members of the City Council.

He admitted that the parking lot raid arrests may be illegal, if people were never told they were trespassing and given a chance to leave.

Bradford said that if that's true, then he wonders why his officers followed an illegal order to arrest everyone.

"No officer in the Houston Police Department has ever been cited with insubordination or any other offense for their refusal to obey an unlawful order nor will they be on my watch," Bradford said.

Councilman Mark Ellis and others said that they wondered why no one blew the whistle before this raid, because a smaller sweep was done the night before at a James Coney Island eatery in which 25 people were arrested.

"Friday night, I didn't know. A chief in charge of the department didn't know, because no one reported it in a significant event report that it had occurred," Bradford said. "So, therefore, there was not that opportunity to intervene before the next night occurred."

The city attorney told the council that if an internal affairs investigation reveals that the arrests were illegal, the city will dismiss all of the charges against all of the people and even overturn the convictions for those who pleaded guilty to get out of jail.

Thirteen officers have been suspended in the wake of the raid, including the officer in charge of the operation, Capt. Mike Aguirre.

One of those people arrested has filed a $100 million lawsuit against the city, accusing Aguirre and the city of falsely arresting him for "attempted trespass."



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: kmartraid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last
To: Dog Gone
The city attorney told the council that if an internal affairs investigation reveals that the arrests were illegal, the city will dismiss all of the charges against all of the people and even overturn the convictions for those who pleaded guilty to get out of jail.

They had better expunge all record of the arrests and give every person an official written apology. Otherwise, these arrests will come back to haunt some of them.

21 posted on 08/28/2002 2:03:43 PM PDT by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justlurking
Agreed. If the City Attorney is smart, he'll make such a motion to the court, and seek City Council permission to refund all the towing fees, as well as issue the written apology.

That won't head off all the lawsuits, but it might substantially reduce any damages that might be awarded.

22 posted on 08/28/2002 2:17:10 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: hopespringseternal
I think the general opinion around town is that Mayor Brown is too dumb to be corrupt.
23 posted on 08/28/2002 2:18:40 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
"Zero tolerance does not override the need for probable cause to issue citations or to make arrests, nor does it mean to arrest everyone in sight," Bradford said.

Glad to hear that clearly stated.

"No officer in the Houston Police Department has ever been cited with insubordination or any other offense for their refusal to obey an unlawful order nor will they be on my watch," Bradford said.

It would be interesting to see how often this has happened and what the situations were.

The city attorney told the council that if an internal affairs investigation reveals that the arrests were illegal, the city will dismiss all of the charges against all of the people and even overturn the convictions for those who pleaded guilty to get out of jail.

And settling lawsuits.

Good article.

24 posted on 08/28/2002 2:24:16 PM PDT by niki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justlurking
I agree,besides job aps,etc.,when you buy a firearm the paperwork asks if you have ever been arrested.I'd been told if you answer yes to any of the questions they couldn't sell you a firearm.

I wonder what happens when people that have been arrested on false charges or found not guilty try to buy a firearm?

25 posted on 08/28/2002 2:26:03 PM PDT by Free Trapper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: wku man
ping - more official information on Kmart
26 posted on 08/28/2002 2:29:12 PM PDT by niki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justlurking
Just checking! I had two friends killed while dragracing. I will promise you the parents didnt blame the police. This will come back to haunt these ninnies in the long run. Its the same with kids in school, my kid does no wrong you caint flunk him or stop her from being cheerleader. I got kicked off the football team one game for smoking. My mother didnt blame the coach she beat the crap out of me.
27 posted on 08/28/2002 2:29:13 PM PDT by cksharks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Do the people know or care that he is corrupt beyond measure?

Obviously not enough. He had a good opponent in the last election, but still managed to get re-elected. In fact I *think* they have 2 year terms and he got re-elected twice. However, there are term limits so this is his last term.

28 posted on 08/28/2002 2:33:52 PM PDT by Cryptic_One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: niki
Good article.

Yes, it was pretty informative, especially since it comes from a TV station. I didn't even bother to post the story from the Houston Chronicle because it's awful. If you're interested, click here.

29 posted on 08/28/2002 2:39:51 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Color perhaps.
30 posted on 08/28/2002 2:43:18 PM PDT by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cksharks
just raise your kids the way your Mom raised you and things will be okay. Give your Mom a big hug for keeping you straight.
31 posted on 08/28/2002 2:48:12 PM PDT by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Free Trapper
No, it asks if you have been convicted of a felony, or if you have been arrested/indicted for a felony (that hasn't been cleared by a dismissal or acquittal).

See http://www.atf.treas.gov/forms/4473/index.htm

32 posted on 08/28/2002 2:51:11 PM PDT by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: justlurking
Thanks,I was thinking I had seen the question on forms in the past.

Bad memory or to many meds. :)

33 posted on 08/28/2002 2:57:13 PM PDT by Free Trapper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: cksharks
1) It is K-Mart, not Wal-Mart.

2) The hypocrisy is just wonderful, don't you think?

34 posted on 08/28/2002 3:13:45 PM PDT by Houmatt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt
The hypocrisy is on behalf of those who profess to believe in the Rule of Law, but don't care if the police observe it.

Despite all the evidence to the contrary, you continue to maintain that everyone in that parking lot that night deserved to be arrested, and is guilty. Your position is simply amazing.

35 posted on 08/28/2002 3:33:31 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: hopespringseternal; cksharks
(I have taken the liberty of adding commentary to this post, in hopes things will be made clearer)

Kmart wanted the problem dealt with -- loiterers and drag racers.

Not just K-Mart, who has since denied they asked for any type of help from the police, but also residents of apartment complexes immediately adjacent to the K-Mart.

Unfortunately, HPD went nuts. Rather than going after the loiterers and drag racers, they just started swooping in, blocking exits, and arresting every single person present, including legitimate customers, on bogus charges.

It seems the implication here is the police just suddenly arrived without warning and started arresting everyone, when no one had done anything wrong. You certainly got that impression with some of the early news reports, with allegedly concerned parents moaning, "Oh, my child is a Straight-A student who has never been in trouble his whole life, and the police just came up and arrested him! Ohhhhh!"

The problem is, that in and of itself is bogus. According to an op-ed piece published in the Houston Chronicle and written by Christine McDonald, the police had been contacted on numerous occasions on complaints of noise and general rowdiness caused by an ever increasing crowd (as mentioned by Houston City Councilman Bert Keller on KHOU-TV).

Police visits to the lot and the posting of No Trespassing signs (which were present on the day of the raid, as indicated by a report by KHOU-TV) went unheeded and ignored.

On August 18, an undercover officer had been inside the K-Mart prior to the raid, handing out cards to whom they believed to be legitimate customers. All they had to do was whip out one of those cards when the raid commenced, and they would not be arrested. The exits were indeed blocked, to keep those who would be arrested from escaping by vehicle.

The James Coney Island raid was conducted on adults who had been meeting for ten years with the blessing of the owner of the establishment and were doing absolutely nothing wrong.

Separate issue, therefore irrelevant.

Because the police made no effort to separate legitimate patrons from loiterers in either raid, they destroyed their own credibility.

Obviously false. If anyone is contributing to the destruction of the credibility of the Houston Police Department, it is the news media, who has deliberately tried to make this look like an act of the Keystone Kops on a group of little angels.

The drag racers and loiterers need to be dealt with, but that probably isn't possible now.

That is, unfortunately, quite so. In fact, things now will only get worse. And you can thank our biased, leftist news media for it.

36 posted on 08/28/2002 3:57:29 PM PDT by Houmatt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Despite all the evidence to the contrary,

I have to say, that is a knee slapper. You make it sound like 100% of the stuff coming out is going against the police. Despite the media bias, the opposite is true. In fact, 80% of the news thus far shows the police were justified in their actions.

37 posted on 08/28/2002 4:05:28 PM PDT by Houmatt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt
No the HPD and Officer Aguirre have only themselves to blame. If I had been illegaly arrested you can bet I would be filing a lawsuit regardless of what the media has to say about it. Houston taxpayers will be paying for their mistakes.
38 posted on 08/28/2002 4:16:41 PM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt
"In fact, 80% of the news thus far shows the police were justified in their actions."

LOL...you must live in a parellel universe? I assure you no one else sees it as you do.

39 posted on 08/28/2002 4:18:58 PM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt
I have no doubt that you'll continue to maintain your position, even after the charges are dropped, police are disciplined, and damages are paid to those falsely arrested.

NONE of the news shows the police were justified, unless you are one of those who believe that the end justifies the means.

You could not care less whether the police were acting legally. All you care about is that some people you don't like were hauled off to jail. You won't even entertain the notion that someone who just happened to be in the lot to conduct business was caught up in the raid.

But I'm convinced that it's pointless to argue with you. You apparently get your news from another planet.

40 posted on 08/28/2002 4:25:40 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson