Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Zviadist
Conserve this shmuck. You've got no credibility with me pal. You issued alarmist warnings on the attack on Afghanistan. The Russians couldn't do it, the British were thrown out on their asses, blah, blah, blah.

To me, your posts are worthless. By chance most people are correct more times than you when you're trying to be. You are a statistical anomaly.

139 posted on 08/28/2002 12:35:57 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]


To: jwalsh07
You issued alarmist warnings on the attack on Afghanistan. The Russians couldn't do it, the British were thrown out on their asses, blah, blah, blah.

Care to point to our "great success" there, pal? Did we get the guys who attacked us? No. Well...I thought that was our purpose.

Are we now forcing our great fighting men to play bodyguard to their unelected and ridiculous "president"? Yep. And it's degrading and disgraceful to the United States Military.

Have we stopped opium production? No...this year's crop is the biggest yet.

Are we seeing increasing factional fighting that threatens American soldiers and "our" government of corrupt Tajiks and Uzbeks? Absolutely.

Are we now going to give BILLIONS of our dollars to socially engineer Afghan women out of their burkhas and other PC nonsense? Yup. (Do you like giving billions of American dollars to nation-build -- something our president said he would never do?)

So I was wrong in my skepticism over our Afghan operation exactly how?

Seriously, if you would like to point to what you consider our great success there I would be interested in seeing it.

151 posted on 08/28/2002 12:49:36 PM PDT by Zviadist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson