Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

National expert blames side effects of depression medication
The Great Falls Tribune ^ | 8/28/2002 | Kim Skornogoski

Posted on 08/28/2002 5:29:46 AM PDT by CholeraJoe

Edited on 05/07/2004 7:33:59 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: CholeraJoe; xsmommy
Apparently the Authorities Don't agree...

Following up

61 posted on 08/29/2002 6:20:29 AM PDT by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe
I see you have abandoned blaming geographical locale (Montanta) for those who murder...which you defended in a vehement manner. If you want any credibility at all, it is okay to admit being wrong, like the big boys do.

No one is perfect. It is ridiculous to defend nonsense. If ones' ego is so tenuous as to be threatened by a refutation of an argument, there are some real "issues" there.

good luck.

62 posted on 08/29/2002 6:27:17 AM PDT by galt-jw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: homeschool mama
HM,

all you have to support your point are facts: better SAT, ACT, always win the spelling bee, etc, etc.

this guy is nothing but a flack for the NEA or some similar outfit. Does this sound like libertarianism or conservatism....advocating state run school, jabbering about Montana, schizophrenically trying to switch contexts by cryptically weaving together Montana, paxil, and a vendetta against home schooling?

do you really think it has escaped this shill that the state run institutions know as schools MANDATE taking pacification (control) drugs?

give me a break. so what is the identity of one who makes such arguments? a madman or an imposter.

63 posted on 08/29/2002 6:35:11 AM PDT by galt-jw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: general_re
gen,

at least they aren't in freemasons and the cfr yet, eh?<[;-)

64 posted on 08/29/2002 6:38:03 AM PDT by galt-jw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: galt-jw
at least they aren't in freemasons and the cfr yet, eh?<[;-)

There's a Chick tract in there somewhere, I can feel it. Well, maybe not, but they have infiltrated Fox News ;)

65 posted on 08/29/2002 6:50:15 AM PDT by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: galt-jw
Good points, galt. Thank you. :o)
66 posted on 08/29/2002 7:42:42 AM PDT by homeschool mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: general_re; All
A useful list -- thanks.

Scientology front groups... what are they?

67 posted on 08/29/2002 7:47:45 AM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: sparkydragon
Good Morning,

I found this on WebMD and thought I would post it for anyone interested.

Have a great Day,
Cindy

What about Those Suicide Reports?
Copied from WebMD-All bout Prozac
http://my.webmd.com/content/dmk/dmk_article_5963107
"There's an ongoing controversy about whether Prozac causes people to try to kill themselves, or whether suicide attempts by users of Prozac are the result of the depression itself.

Studies have shown that at the beginning of treatment, 10 percent to 15 percent of patients feel more anxious after taking Prozac, but this anxiety eventually passes.

There also have been reports of anger and irritability among users of Prozac. Very irritable patients usually find their temperaments improving on Prozac, but it's a different story with manic-depressives. If manic highs involve anger, paranoia, or irritability and you take Prozac without first being stabilized on lithium, the manic side of your mood may break through and you could experience these symptoms. Many scientists believe that Prozac may initially increase manic symptoms because the drug increases a person's energy before it has successfully altered mood. This could suddenly prompt a suicide attempt in someone who had previously been too lethargic to make the effort. Indeed, several studies have suggested that people who are slowed down by depression in this way do appear to have a temporary increased risk of suicide as the depression eases.

Prozac experienced a temporary backlash in 1990 after reports circulated that it induced violent and suicidal tendencies in some users; the Church of Scientology led the attack against the drug, which focused on a small group of patients who had suicidal or violent thoughts.

In 1990 the church filed a citizen's petition with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration asking that Prozac be withdrawn from the market, citing a Harvard Medical School study published in the American Journal of Psychiatry stating that 6 out of 172 high-risk mental patients who had been resistant to other drugs had become preoccupied with violent suicidal thoughts while on Prozac. Two of them tried unsuccessfully to kill themselves. Although none of the six had appeared to be suicidal when they started taking Prozac, five had had suicidal thoughts before. At the time, four of the six were also taking other medications (one was taking five other drugs).

The Scientologists took that study's findings of the six individuals and extrapolated them to the entire United States population, claiming that 140,000 people in the United States have become violent and suicidal on Prozac and charging that widespread use of Prozac would promote waves of violence. They backed up this claim by pointing to mass murderer Joseph Wesbecker, who killed himself and eight coworkers at a printing plant in Louisville, Kentucky, with an AK-47 assault rifle. A Scientology group alleged that Wesbecker, who they said had no history of violence, went berserk because he took Prozac. Subsequent media reports revealed Wesbecker had a large gun collection, had tried to kill himself 12 times in the past, and had often talked about killing his employers.

Because so many depressed people are also suicidal, the fact that a few severely depressed patients taking antidepressants became suicidal didn't surprise researchers. The FDA was concerned, however, because Prozac affects serotonin, a neurotransmitter known to be linked with aggression. After further study, however, in 1991 the FDA rejected the petition, reaffirming Prozac's safety. This decision was followed two months later by a unanimous announcement by the FDA advisory committee and an independent scientific advisory committee that Prozac and other antidepressants do not cause violence or suicidal behavior, and that Prozac, on the contrary, appears to guard against violent behavior. The announcement included the information that large-scale studies show that people taking Prozac are less suicidal than those taking a placebo or other antidepressant drugs. This affirmation of support was backed by the National Mental Health Association and the American Psychiatric Association.

The research the groups relied on included an extremely large comparison of 3,065 patients on anti-depressants published in the British Medical Journal. The study found no evidence of increased suicide risk or suicidal thoughts in people taking Prozac or tricyclics. In the study, Prozac caused fewer substantial suicidal thoughts than did tricyclics or placebo. Of those people who did have suicidal thoughts when they started taking the drugs, those given a placebo had the highest increase in those thoughts, with Prozac showing the least increase (17.9 percent for placebo, 16.3 percent for tricyclics and 15.3 percent for Prozac). Most patients taking Prozac and tricyclics experienced a decrease in suicidal thoughts (about 72 percent).

By January 1994, 78 suits against Eli Lilly (Prozac's manufacturers) had been dismissed and 160 others had been filed, charging that Prozac causes everything from rashes to violent death.

"When I first went on Prozac, it was in the early days when everyone was talking about suicide and this drug," Marie says. "I was somewhat concerned about that. My friends asked me if I was sure I knew what I was doing."

Indeed, despite the suits and bad publicity, the popularity of this drug never declined; Lilly's Prozac sales haven't had a bad year since the drug was released in 1987. In 1993, sales reached $1.2 billion worldwide ($880 million in the United States alone), surpassing the sales of all previously used antidepressants around the world. Sales are expected to increase another 12 percent in 1994.

As we've seen from the above discussion, if you're depressed, it's possible you might have some suicidal thoughts; between 40 and 60 percent of people with major depression do. Tell your doctor immediately if you start feeling self-destructive."

68 posted on 08/29/2002 7:56:17 AM PDT by wndycndy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: dighton
"Scientologists?"

Looks like it to me! See my previous post, about half way through (yeah, I know it's LONG, sorry).

69 posted on 08/29/2002 7:59:25 AM PDT by wndycndy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion
Is it possible for all of you to be right about just who is qualified to homeschool?

If you remember from the original thread, I made the point that my wife, who does the bulk of the teaching at home, hated high school and barely graduated. If someone's teaching skills are limited to passing on pure information to a child, then I would agree with CholeraJoe that the best candidate is obviously the most educated. But teaching goes beyond just the transference of information from one parent (adult) to child. My wife absolutely adores children and loves nurturing them, and this "skill" is absolutely necessary in the learning process. This love is the birthplace of learning, which makes the home an ideal place for early learning.

As the child grows, it becomes more important to that the parent have a grasp on the "knowledge" part of teaching or the child may become frustrated. If the parents skills are lacking, the child will suffer. The proverbial Master/Pupil theory of education becomes very important at this stage of the game. That is one reason we encouraged our oldest kids to start taking classes at the local Junior College when they were 15 or 16. They were beyond our abilities to teach "knowledge" in some subjects.

If I am not mistaken, education followed this pattern up until the mid-1800's. Parents taught the children the basics at home, and then the child, if he/she displayed above average abilities, might be privately tutored or sent to university for a formal education. Other children, with lesser abilities, were apprenticed into a family business or some local trade.

70 posted on 08/29/2002 8:11:35 AM PDT by Sangamon Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe
See post #70
71 posted on 08/29/2002 8:19:16 AM PDT by Sangamon Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: wndycndy
Good find, and no need to apologize for its length.

Scientologists? ... Looks like it to me!

Confirmed here.

72 posted on 08/29/2002 8:20:25 AM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Sangamon Kid
Yes well . . . considering the deafening silence from Joe, I think he has no answer for my objections to his elitism. He hardly would claim that he learned nothing while teaching graduate students, so the idea that a tutoring parent learns nothing is fatuous.

As to the idea that a child might develop to the point where s/he can develop further only with guidance from someone more expert than the parent, I would say that unless the parent is raising the child to follow directly in his/her own footsteps, that is a question not of "if" but of when.

And speaking of a child following in a parent's footsteps, here's a case for you:

dad runs contracting business

son shows up on the job site

dad says, "Why aren't you in school?"

son says, "School is boring and I want to work."

dad says, "You'll never wear a white shirt."

son says, "I know."

What will come of that boy? Just like an immigrant to America wants to go home a success or not at all, our emigrant from school to work had something to prove. The son takes over the father's business, increases its profits, and retires to Florida well-off. No college degree, nor even a high school diploma. Both his daughters are prosperous college grads--and he never broke a sweat paying for their tuition.
73 posted on 08/29/2002 2:04:29 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe; Al B.
Have you ever read "Bitter Harvest" by Anne Ruell? It is about a female physician who took Prozac and slowly tried to murder her husband with Ricin and later burned her house down with her kids in it. The husband, also a physician, survived. She was found guilty.

Anne Ruell didn't blame the Prozac, instead she demonized this formerly highly accomplished woman. The doctor herself describes feeling split off from herself and watching someone else do the crimes...which is a constant theme among Prozac users...dissociation.

74 posted on 08/31/2002 5:59:25 AM PDT by rubbertramp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Al B.
Even worse than the behavioral toxicity psychotropics cause is the mistaken notion that one can "cure" behavioral problems with drugs alone.

There have been less than flattering things posted about the Yates family. Similarly, immediately after the Columbine massacre, before the hagiographers got started, there were stories of jocks running rampant, and having the school staff look the other way, if not encourage them, as they assaulted the more bookish kids there.

IMO the drugs do, sometimes, cause problems, but these can't be examined and addressed until common sense solutions are required before drugs are used to blunt the emotions of the disaffected.

75 posted on 08/31/2002 6:35:45 PM PDT by a history buff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: fone
No kidding, talk about the treatment being worse than the disease eh?
76 posted on 09/05/2002 5:50:02 AM PDT by glory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe
sigh..here we go again. CJ, you are dead wrong and the information on homeschooling refute what you just said. As for higher level courses, many parents choose to put thier children into high school(feeling that they have given them a solid foundation morally and educationally to adjust to the new environment), use junior colleges to teach these courses(I believe in most states you only have to be 15 to attend--in AZ it was 13 if I remember right), or use correspondence courses and coops for the more complicated stuff. There are plenty of options without doing all that you "require" which would leave a very limited time frame in which to even birth children given female biology and would require homeschool parents have signifigant MORE training than even the average public school teacher.
77 posted on 09/05/2002 5:55:21 AM PDT by glory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion
Funny thing is this gal with only a handful of college courses recently helped my PUBLIC HIGH school taught, sophomore niece with her algebra homework--SEVERAL TIMES! All came rushing back. The teacher did not do an adequate job with the lesson and I ended up teaching her. sigh, so much for formal training.
78 posted on 09/05/2002 6:01:19 AM PDT by glory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: sparkydragon
I hear you sparky. I had an abyssmal home life and it had a big hand in why I didn't finish school AND has a big hand in why I want to be so intimately involved in thier schooling. It wasn't for lack of motivation since I did go on to college, on my own bill I might add, but that ended when I got my brokering license and then got married and started a family. Funny thing is I did better than most of the folks I know who graduated, including the honors students--of course I measure my life by more than just my career;-)
79 posted on 09/05/2002 6:05:43 AM PDT by glory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: 2Jedismom
Oh gosh, I know average moms in my area that talk like this when you greet them. Drives me nuts!!! grrr
80 posted on 09/05/2002 6:10:01 AM PDT by glory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson