Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The world’s least-free country
Backwoods Home Magazine ^ | Sept/Oct 2002 | John Silveira

Posted on 08/28/2002 4:44:33 AM PDT by watcher1

Here’s a quiz: Which is the freest country on earth? The answer’s easy. It’s the United States. Ask anyone. And why are we the freest? Not because we’re the richest. Long before we became the world’s richest nation we still regarded ourselves as the freest, and millions flocked to our shores to enjoy that freedom. The reasons we are free are: First, because of the philosophical basis upon which this country was founded. It is assumed that individuals have rights, e.g., free speech, the right to bear arms, the right of a jury trial before our peers should the government try to imprison us, seize our property, or deprive us of our lives, etc. Second, we have a Constitution that limits the powers of a central government to intrude into our lives.

And third, our rights have been enshrined in the First 10 Amendments to our Constitution.

Many other countries, like England and Canada, also have their own Bill of Rights, but those rights are at the pleasure of the government. It says so right in their laws. So they are not “unalienable” rights. Only our country, in all of history, was founded on the assumption that the individual has rights that exist apart from the government and not at its pleasure. Then, in 1868, the Constitution was amended to say that even the states cannot violate our unalienable rights. Pretty powerful stuff. These things form the basis of our freedom and are the reasons why the United States is the freest country on earth.

So if we can identify the freest country, can we also identify that which is the least free? I’ve tried to find a qualitative way to make that determination, but it’s difficult, because no country has a constitution that guarantees tyranny. Even the constitutions of the old Soviet Union and the People’s Republic of China read as if those countries were free. You’d never have guessed that what happened under Stalin and Mao could have happened, just from reading those documents. (Of course, you’d never have guessed we once enslaved a huge portion of our own citizens or screwed the Indians out of a large portion of a continent by reading our Constitution. But that’s another story.)

What I’m getting at is it’s hard to determine qualitatively which is the least free country on earth. So I decided to see if there is a quantitative way to measure it. I found two. First, the country with the most laws would be a candidate for that which is least free. Laws regulate people, so the country which is the least free would surely regulate its people the most. Second, the country with the greatest percentage of its population in jail would also be a candidate for the least free, for obvious reasons. And, if, by chance, some country not only had the most laws but also had the largest percentage of its own population behind bars, we’d at least have a candidate for the least free country on the planet.

So which country has the most laws regulating its citizenry? After looking high and low I discovered that the country with the most laws—not just today, but in all of history is...geez Louise, it’s the United States. We not only have the most laws in all of history, but we also turn out more new laws and regulations to manage our people every single year than most countries turn out in decades.

How can it be that the world’s freest country needs more laws to tell its people what to do than the Soviet Union, Red China, Nazi Germany, or any two-bit banana republic dictatorship? And it’s not like we’ve always had so many laws. Most of them are new. In 1814, when President Madison and the Congress fled Washington, DC, ahead of the invading English troops bent on arson, they took the papers of the federal government with them. It was easy. They loaded all the laws and regulations into a few boxes and left. This was all the federal government had generated to regulate us in the first 38 years of our existence. Today, Congress and anonymous bureaucrats generate more laws and regulations than that in minutes.

Maybe we should consider the other criterion. Which country imprisons the highest percentage of its own citizens? Let’s see, Russia’s up there. And so is the Union of South Africa. And there are some little potentates as we see in Iraq, Iran, and Afghanistan. Hmm, but who leads the list. On, no! Folks, you’re not going to like this. It’s...it’s...the United States, again, heading the list of least free countries. The prime reason is the War on Drugs, the war waged against our country’s own citizens “for their own good.”

When I presented my results to others, some said if you obey the laws, you have nothing to worry about and you’ll still be free. I pointed out that that’s the case in every country. Toe the line and you won’t get in trouble. If the women in Afghanistan wore their burkas and didn’t drive or get an education, then by that definition they could still be free. I also pointed out that Jews in Nazi Germany, blacks in the postbellum South, and many American Indians did toe the line and tried to be good citizens but they still got screwed. So obeying the law doesn’t guarantee freedom.

Another said, despite all our laws, we have safeguards in that we have a jury system and that those laws are filtered through juries. I pointed out that more and more agencies regulate us without juries. E.g., the IRS, family courts, OSHA, the EPA, etc. don’t allow juries. And where juries are allowed the courts exclude people who realize they can nullify bad laws. This is hardly a recipe for freedom.

So, somehow, I have arrived at a paradox. What, on paper, would appear to be the freest society in the world appears, in practice, to be among the most oppressive.
Does this bother anyone besides me?


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: freedom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-134 next last
To: watcher1
I'm going to venture a prediction: in lieu of the lunacy I am witnessing at their inability to keep the airlines flowing, I hereby predict that they are going to attack the roads and highways next---it'll be "checkpoint city."
21 posted on 08/28/2002 5:31:02 AM PDT by Born on the Storm King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
I know nobody wants to hear it, but I guess I'm gonna tell you anyway.

If you watched some european household talk about American freedom & laws some 10 years or so ago, the people would have thought "we want that too".

But not anymore.
Today, most Europeans would not want to switch. Patriot Act? Sneak & Peek Searches? TIPS Program? Military used as Law Enforcment? War on Drugs?

Land of the free? We will see, won't we?
22 posted on 08/28/2002 5:32:17 AM PDT by SkyRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: watcher1
Do you have actual numbers for the laws on the books in the US and other nations?
23 posted on 08/28/2002 5:34:15 AM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: watcher1
I think we should compare ourselves to how we were ( say 50 or 100 years ago) to how we are now.

Oh, really? Yeah, 50 or 100 years ago would have been fine for someone like YOU, but pure hell for someone like me.

There's an element here that wants to return to the pre-1950 era. You'll understand that a very small number of us at FR would say to that idea, "No, thank you."

24 posted on 08/28/2002 5:34:49 AM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Born on the Storm King
I hereby predict that they are going to attack the roads and highways next---it'll be "checkpoint city."

You know it!

25 posted on 08/28/2002 5:35:08 AM PDT by watcher1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: watcher1
Yes, it bothers me! Any comments before this gets pulled?

Sure.

How did I know where this article was going after reading the first few (misleading) paragraphs?

26 posted on 08/28/2002 5:37:13 AM PDT by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: watcher1
There is only one reason to have complex language in the laws and regulations, to make work for American lords and ladies, the lawyers. Maybe we can have AlGore, really reinvent govt, by burning the law books. Rewrite them in plain lingo, and drown all the lawyers. That would A) get rid of all lawyers, and B)clean out the dead wood in Washington.
27 posted on 08/28/2002 5:42:37 AM PDT by jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: watcher1
Posts critical of the status quo seem to have a short life on FR lately

Only when deliberately misleading or blatantly ignorant.

Why the U.S. can be both the most free country and the one with the most laws without the apparent contradiction would take more time than most of us have.

I can list, for starters, four reasons: misapplication of constitutional principles of guilt, ignorance, system of laws (vs European, for instance), and attorneys.

28 posted on 08/28/2002 5:43:08 AM PDT by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
This has nothing to do with race.
Don't look at it that way
29 posted on 08/28/2002 5:43:21 AM PDT by watcher1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: watcher1
What a stupid, brainless argument for 'freedom'. This guy's mind is already dilated on drugs.
30 posted on 08/28/2002 5:48:04 AM PDT by CWRWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E Rocc
Great, Eric.

Good to know that the US is still better than Cuba, North Korea, and Iraq. Think about what you are saying from the perspective of 1776.

31 posted on 08/28/2002 5:49:52 AM PDT by sam_paine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CWRWinger
"Socialists fear all liberties." Frederic Bastiat, The Law, 1850
32 posted on 08/28/2002 5:50:41 AM PDT by watcher1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: watcher1
Some of our laws arise from the complexity of our society, i.e. from wealth. A country in which one in 1000 people owned a car for instance would not require our driving rules and regulations.
33 posted on 08/28/2002 5:55:03 AM PDT by medved
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: watcher1
One of the most overlooked inalienable rights is the right to the pursuit of happiness.

I have a neighbor who is a Palestinian. He moved here 20 years ago. And he says that, for the average Palestinian in the Middle East, there is no possibility for him to improve his lot in life because the society will not allow him to do anything other than what he has always done.

My neighbor repeatedly tells me that the greatest thing about the USA is that anyone can do whatever he wants with no societal sanctions. In the Middle East, unless you are born into wealth, there is nothing you can do to free yourself from a menial existence.

Think about it, and you should agree that this freedom, to pursue happiness, is quite powerful and greatly underrated.

34 posted on 08/28/2002 5:58:50 AM PDT by HIDEK6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: watcher1
Socialists love drugs because a free republic cannot be maintained if its citizens are stoned or drunk.
35 posted on 08/28/2002 5:59:18 AM PDT by CWRWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: medved
Some of our laws arise from the complexity of our society...

OK, so what about the other 95%

36 posted on 08/28/2002 5:59:58 AM PDT by watcher1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: CWRWinger
What makes you think the author of this article is a drug user?
37 posted on 08/28/2002 6:00:59 AM PDT by watcher1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: watcher1
Are you a 'libertarian'?
38 posted on 08/28/2002 6:01:00 AM PDT by CWRWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

Comment #39 Removed by Moderator

To: SkyRat
But not anymore. Today, most Europeans would not want to switch. Patriot Act? Sneak & Peek Searches? TIPS Program? Military used as Law Enforcment? War on Drugs?

Interesting comment. It would seem that 54% of Britons would not agree with your statement.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/739573/posts

40 posted on 08/28/2002 6:05:04 AM PDT by American Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-134 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson