Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Deuce
Secondly, history is no indication (let alone guarantee) of the future vis a vis stock market, but even using 8% real return expectation from stocks and 2.79% for bonds/SS produces only a 4.35% return (less than double, let alone triple).

I agree there is no guarantee, but I'd rather bet on the market than on the government. If my wife's and my own SS contributions had been invested in the S & P 500 over the last 15 years, I'd have enough money now even with the recent market drop to more than pay for an annuity to give me double or triple my expected SS check in 2032.

Third, counteracting your scenario where you die before 67, is the scenario where you fritter away your investment and have nothing under the private scenario and live a long life.

Well, if you want protection against your own poor choices, you could move to Cuba and get free healthcare too. TANSTAAFL.

35 posted on 08/28/2002 8:46:20 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Toddsterpatriot
I agree there is no guarantee, but I'd rather bet on the market than on the government. If my wife's and my own SS contributions had been invested in the S & P 500 over the last 15 years, I'd have enough money now even with the recent market drop to more than pay for an annuity to give me double or triple my expected SS check in 2032.

You cannot separate government/political system from the market. The stable/productive market is a product of stable and rational system of government. And we do not know what will be in 2032 - extrapolations rarely work in the historical process over long periods.

37 posted on 08/28/2002 8:57:17 AM PDT by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson