Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ken H
"Pretty wierd guy, but I'd say the Second Amendment applies here. "

On a serious note, consider what an RKBA defense could generate here. The court would have to rule on an interpretation of the actual grammer contained in the 2nd amendment. It doesn't say weapons, firearms, flintlocks or sabres...it says arms. Just like it says people.

31 posted on 08/27/2002 2:17:29 PM PDT by Cobra Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Cobra Scott; Ken H
On a serious note, consider what an RKBA defense could generate here. The court would have to rule on an interpretation of the actual grammer contained in the 2nd amendment. It doesn't say weapons, firearms, flintlocks or sabres...it says arms. Just like it says people.

And the government would acknowledge the right, but argue that the Constitution only grants it to the National Guard.

34 posted on 08/27/2002 2:27:48 PM PDT by TexRef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: Cobra Scott
"The court would have to rule on an interpretation of the actual grammer contained in the 2nd amendment"

Not to mention the spelling.

--Boris

44 posted on 08/27/2002 6:32:28 PM PDT by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson